Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Introduction <br /> <br /> <br />Irrigoled avocados. <br /> <br />The operation of the Colorado River Basin <br />during the post year and the projected <br />operation for the current year reflect flood <br />control, domestic use, irrigation, <br />hydroelectric power generation, water <br />quality control, tish and wildlife <br />propagation, recreation, and Colorado River <br />Compact requirements. <br /> <br />Storage and release of water from the <br />Upper Basin reservoirs are governed by all <br />applicable laws and agreements concerning <br />the Colorado River, including the <br />impoundment and release of water in the <br />Upper Basin required by Section 602(0\ of <br />the Colorado River Basin Project Act of <br />_S~pt.!'I11Qes 30, 1.968 (Public Law 90-537). <br />The operation of the Lower Basin reservoirs <br />reflects Mexican Treaty obligotions and <br />lower Basin con1roctuol commitments. <br /> <br />Nothing in this report is intended to <br />interpret the provisions of the Colorado <br />River Compact (45 Stat. 1057), the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin Compact (63 Stat. 31). <br />the Water Treaty of 1944 with the United <br />Mexican States (Treaty Series 994, 59 Stat. <br />1219), the Decree entered by the Supreme <br />Court of the United States in Arizona v. <br />California e' 01. (376 U.S. 3~O). the Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act (45 Stat. 1057), the <br />Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act (54 <br />Stat. 77~: 43 U.S.C 6180). the Colorado <br />River Storage Project Act (70 Stat. 105; 43 <br />U.S.c. 620), or the Colorado River Basin <br />Project Act (82 Stat. 885; ~3 U.S.C 1501). <br />2 <br /> <br />Authority for Report <br /> <br /> <br />Pursuant to the Colorado River Basin <br />Project Act (Public Law 90-537) of 1968, <br />I am pleased to present to the Congress, <br />and to the Governors of the Colorado River <br />Basin States. the fourteenth annual report <br />on 1he Operation of the Colorado River <br />Basin. <br /> <br />This report describes the octuol operation <br />of the reservoirs in the Colorado River <br />drainage area constructed under the <br />authority of the Colorado River Storage <br />Proiec' Act, the Boulder Canyon Project <br />Act, and the Boulder Canyon Project <br />Adjustment Act during water year 1984. <br />Also described in this report is the <br />projected operation_of these -reservoirs - <br />during water year 1985 under the "Criteria <br />for Coordinated Long.Range Operation of <br />Colorado River Reservoirs," published in the <br />Federal Register June 10, 1970. <br /> <br />William P. Clark, Secretary <br />United States Department of the Interior <br /> <br />Actual Operations Under <br />Criteria - Water Year 1984 <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />Le-It spillway flash boards. GI_n Conyon Dom <br /> <br />The initial plan oi operotion for water year <br />1984, based on average inflow conditions, <br />called for scheduled releases from Lake <br />Powell of 14.6 million acre-feet (maf). Thi! <br />plan of operation would have created 6.5 <br />maf of vacant space in the Colorado River <br />reservoir system by September 30, 1984, of <br />which 2.9 mef would have been in lake <br />Powell. With this volume of release the <br />contents of lake Powell would have <br />remained below the contents of lake Meae <br />for the entire water year. A plan to <br />equalize the projected end of water year <br />active contents of lake Powell and lake <br />Mead was not required becau5e (1) excess <br />water was being released from lake Mead <br />to. avoid-anticipated- spills- and (2) repair of <br />spillways at Glen Canyon was being <br />completed. <br /> <br />The April through July forecast of runoH <br />made on January 6, 19SA, was 13 maf or <br />174 percent of normal. Accordingly, <br />releases from Glen Canyon were <br />maintained at maximum powerplant <br />capacity. For 10 weeks through mid.March <br />however, a much drier pattern developed <br />with precipitation as low as 40 percent of <br />normal over the entire basin during <br />January. By April 5, 1984, the runoff <br />forecast had dropped '0 11.5 maf or 154 <br />percent of normal. A cold. wet April <br />