Laserfiche WebLink
<br />AIIUAL REPORT FOR 1963 <br /> <br />was 91,970 a.t. or 12,160 a.t. more than the measured inflow. This is <br />the accretion of smal11nflows along 20 miles of tbe ArkanBas aod rUD- <br />art from Rule Creek. <br />Our Reservotr sy~lem has been maintained in good working <br />condWon, and would 'be able to store a lot at water if It was availa,b.le. <br />Only about 10.000 a.t. of storage below Pueblo is earlier than the <br />Great PlatDs. This year, very BLUe water wa.s available in the Arkansas <br />and most of the time it was called for d.irect irrigation. <br />Direct flow dema'ods for irrigation water has all but elimin- <br />ated the opportunity for wInter storage. There is DO Question bur that <br />much of this water Is wasted in severe weather. Ditches are Ice.d aDd <br />highways flooded. The State Engineer or the Supreme Court should be <br />asked to clarity .beneticial uses of this winter water. <br />The ditches in District No. 67 diverted 84.900 acre feet dur- <br />Ing the irrigation season and 10,36,0 acre feet during the winter stor- <br />age period. The State Line flow amounted to 33,250 acre feet in the <br />five winter monlhs and 3'4,680' &'Cre teet (rom April 1 to Nov.!. Up- <br />stream diversions ot Arkansas River water below Pueblo amounted to <br />187,760 8.cre feet during the five winter months and 259,240 acre leet <br />from April 1 to November 1. <br />River flow with large fluctu.atiaDs such as we had thIs year <br />when water was available create prOblems in dlstrlhution that are not <br />present when a controlled su.pply is available from the Reservoir. Your <br />patience and cooperatlon was appreciated, by the op.erating personnel <br />In dIstributing what was availalble to the best advantage. <br />A report on a stUdy of depletion of river by stock ponds has <br />been made -to the Arkansas River Compact Administration. It was <br />found that 697 stock ,ponds ",,'ith an average capacity of 3.1 .a.1. and <br />total capacity of 1,906 a:f. had been constructed in water district No. <br />67. Upstream there .were 300 with .a total capacity of 1.352 a.f., in <br />District No. 14 and 299 with a total catmclty of 1,024 a:f. In DIstrict <br />No. 17. Other Btock ponds on the Arkansas water shed number 1,481 <br />and have a capacit.y of approximately 4,000 a.t. These all have a <br />d~Unlte effect on run otf at certain times but pr()bably no more than <br />cOntour listing ot cultivated areas and subsoillng of pasture land. <br />Because ot the agitation for the creation of a permanent pool <br />In John MarUn Re.servolr your Superintendent and Directors have made <br />a study at some ot the prOblems that would confront water users be- <br />low the dam. Losses In evaporation, Bedlmentatlon and difficulties of <br />administration are staggering. We are convinced that if the propon. <br />eMs would m8Jk.e .a like study they WOUld not support the Permanent <br />1'<>01. <br /> <br />During the lut four .years of low nows on the Arkansas <br />R1ver the outflows ot the Reservoir have exceeded the inflows by very <br />8u.bstantlal amounts. Inflows to the Reservoir are caretully measured. <br />at Las Anlmas .aDd Jlkewise the outtlo".s are measured b€low the Dam. <br />Water which orIgln.ates in the area between Las Animas and the <br />ReservoIr is Dot measured. .In 196.0 inflows to the Reservoir amounted <br />to 102,990 a.t. and the outflow 117,700 a.t. River accretIons In the <br />Reservoir area 14,710 a.t. In 1961, Inflows 136,460 a.f. outflow 147.700 <br />I.t. Accretions 11,360 a.t. In 1'96'2, Inflows 124,300 a.t. and outflow8 <br />1.9,600 a.f. Accretions 26,200 a.t. In 1963 the outflows exceeded the <br />Inflow by 12.160 a.f. During years of larger inflows and greater stOl"" <br />age In John Martin there ls undoubtedly large quantIties at water not <br />measured at the two gauges at Las Animas. The accrettons are harder <br /> <br />.Pa,a 4_ <br />