Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1\.), <br />en <br />en <br />f\) <br /> <br />It has long been recognized that the <br />consumption of soap and detergents would be <br />greater in areas of hard water. Other costs <br />resulting from water hardness include treatment <br />for softening, wear on clothing, reduced life of <br />cooking utensils, and scaling of water heaters. As <br />can be seen in table 9, not all these areas were <br />analyzed in the present study. However, where <br />applicable, estimates from this study will be used <br />to update some of the previous estimates. <br /> <br />Household damages due to salinity have been <br />estimated by a number of researchers. The <br />Orange County and the Black and Veatch studies <br />are the most complete of those available (see <br />appendix 1 of the Andersen and Kleinman <br />report)." Estimates from the present study along <br />with estimates from the two studies mentioned <br />above and other available information contained <br />in various salinity reports have been used to <br />create table 10. Not all household items that <br />might be affected by salinity in other reports <br />were used because sufficient evidence was <br />lacking that a real detrimental effect occurs. The <br />individual items used were those judged to be <br />important and relevant to the average household <br />in the Lower Colorado River area. The "best <br />estimates" have been tabulated for each of the <br />three areas, resulting in a total cost per milligram <br />per liter of $0.1087 for the Lower Main Stem, <br />$0.1073 for the CAP service area, and $0.1583 <br />for the MWD s~rvice area. <br /> <br />In order to calculate the estimated damages for <br />individual areas and for the entire Lower <br />Colorado River Basin, an estimate is needed of <br />the average annual number of households <br />affected by the quality of the Colorado River. <br />Certain assumptions and procedures were <br />developed for each of the three areas. <br /> <br />Growth projections of towns and cities along the <br />Lower Main St~m were derived from the most <br />recent two decades of population increases as <br />noted in the respective U.S. Census of <br />Population. In Las Vegas for example, where <br />recent population projections were available, <br />these estimates were used instead of the Census. <br />The projections of growth were discounted to <br />the present (1976) using 6-3/8 percent and put <br />on an annual basis over a 50-year period, <br />resulting in 250,100 households. The Las Vegas <br />Valley greatly influenced this annual estimate. In <br /> <br />10 Ibid.. pp. 41-82 (app. 1 by Jackson, Ernest S.). <br /> <br />addition to the Las Vegas Valley, service was <br />assumed to be available to Boulder City, Nevada; <br />Parker, Yuma, Kingman, Havasu City, and <br />Mohave Valley, Arizona; Needles, Blythe, EI <br />Centro, Brawley, and Calexico, California; and <br />other smaller communities. Annual detriments <br />for each household per milligram per liter <br />amount to $0.1087, which when multiplied by <br />the number of households, gives a total damage <br />for the area on an annual basis of $ 27,200. <br />Using the range of values given in table 10, this <br />value could vary from $20,900 to $46,500. <br /> <br />While firm numbers are not yet fUIIJ established, <br />a reasonable estimate suitable for the purpose at <br />hand for the CAP is that SOme 245,000 full <br />service equivalent households on a discounted <br />annual basis will receive Colorado River water <br />beginning in 1987. Household use is estimated <br />at 937 m' (0.76 acre-It) per household each <br />year. Annual detriments for each household per <br />milligram per liter amount to $0.1073. Total <br />annual detriments would be $26,300. Using a <br />range of values given in table 10, detriments <br />could vary from $20,500 to $45,600. <br /> <br />The MWD water from the Colorado River will be <br />blended with State Water Plan water with the <br />salinity levels eventually falling to about <br />350 mg/L according to current estimates. The <br />equivalent full service capability of the portion <br />of the 678 x 106 m' (550 OOO-acre-ft) Colorado <br />River diversion alter 1987 used by households <br />and the larger diversions up to that time amount <br />to about 1,181,000 homes on an annual basis. <br />It is assumed that the 1977-87 annual diversions <br />will be about 1.298 x 10' m' (1 052000 acre-ft) <br />for municipal use. Diversions will be cut back to <br />6 78x 106 m' (550000 acre It) per year in 1987 <br />with 493 x 106 m' (400 000 acre-It) used for <br />municipal purposes. Calculations are based on <br />826 m' (0.67 acre-It) for each household per <br />year. Annual detriments for this area are <br />estimated to total $187,000 and the range <br />could be between $98,000 and $219,700. <br /> <br />The summary of economic impacts upon <br />municipal users is shown on table 11. The most <br />likely expected annual total for the three areas <br />is $ 240,500 per mg/L with a reasonable range <br />of from $140,200 to $311,800. A linear <br />function has been used to derive municipal <br />damages and, therefore, a constant per-unit <br />impact is considered for the relevant levels of <br />TDS. <br /> <br />14 <br />