Laserfiche WebLink
<br />quality levels ,Ire maintained in boiler and <br />coolil1g systelTls by periodically adding an <br />amount of relAtively good-quality water <br />(makeup water) and discharging from the <br />system an equell volume of the poorer quality <br />water (hlowdowTl). <br /> <br />N <br />en <br />(JI <br />(.1,.) <br /> <br />E. Evaluation Procedures <br /> <br />The cost of applying alternative remedial actions <br />was determined lor each user, and the least <br />costly alternative or combination of alternatives <br />was selected Inr suhsequent analyses. Economic <br />studies were intnllded to provide a basis for <br />assessing the economic impact of a change in <br />salinity levels. Water quality, water use patterns, <br />?lnd economic conditions were projected for <br />each group of users. Through the application of <br />appropriate tin18-v;-1Iuc factors and adjustments, <br />mpresentative impact estim?ltes were made. The <br />individual prOCec1LJI es will vary for the different <br />users, but th8 results represent direct plus <br />indirect (in the case 01 agriculture) penalty costs <br />which are on <'1 comparable basis and can be <br />aggregated for tl", entire Impacted area. <br /> <br />'1. Agricllltlllc. l P (linear pronraming) <br />models were formulclted for each agricultural <br />Hrea curr-ently receiving. or- expected to <br />receive in the near future. water from the <br />Colorado River. Agricultural yield decrements <br />and fllternative management practices which <br />might be implemented by larmers as salinity <br />levels increase were evaluated by researchers <br />of the LJnivelsity of Arizona and the LJniversity <br />of California. Ih8se rohysical data were then <br />LJsed as inputs ror an LP profit maximization <br />model, wherein the optimal farmer response <br />to salinity chanqe is delineated. Optimization <br />results for solinity levels r-anging from 900 to <br />1400 mg/I wore used to estimate the <br />parameters o! ;1 dnm?lge function for each <br />irnpacted [1r8H. <br /> <br />BeCfluse of the interdependence of numerous <br />economic activities. there exist indirect <br />effects 011 the regional economy stemming <br />tmm the diruct economic impact of salinity <br />upon agriculturnl water users. These effects, <br />termed indirect pennlty costs. can be <br />determined if the interdependency of <br />economic activities is known. Procedures <br />were used to follow changes affecting any <br />agricultural illdustry through a chain of <br />transClctions in cnder to identify secondary or <br /> <br />indirect effects on the economy stemming <br />from the direct economic costs of salinity. <br />Though less confidence is placed in these <br />estimates, nevertheless. it should be <br />recognized that salinity affects more than just <br />the direct water users. <br /> <br />2. Municipal. A high level of TDS (total <br />dissolved solids) of water distributed by a <br />municipality will adversely affect individual <br />users. Such adverse effects relate to the <br />esthetic quality of the water and to the <br />operation and maintenance costs associated <br />with its beneficial use. Estimation of monetary <br />impacts (additional costs) for a typical <br />household was derived by calculating the <br />present worth of differing lengths of time for <br />typical household items associated with <br />different levels of.salinity. The objective of this <br />procedure was to determine the annual costs <br />of replacement required to maintain the <br />services of certa in household items over a <br />50-year period.' Examples of items affected <br />and repairs necessitated by the corrosiveness <br />of water include water heaters, piping and <br />fixtures, and water damage from broken <br />appliances. <br /> <br />The analytical procedure required that major <br />municipal users be identified. Since major <br />impacts and sizable population centers are not <br />found above Lake Mead. this study was <br />confined to the Lower Colorado River Basin <br />and divided into three separate areas. The <br />areas are (1) the MWD (Metropolitan Water <br />District) of California service area; (2) the CAP <br />(Central Arizona Project) service area, and <br />(3) the Lower Main Stem municipal service <br />area which includes cities along the Colorado, <br />in the Imperial Valley. and Las Vegas. Nevada, <br />including surrounding cities. <br /> <br />Plumbing contractors and appliance dealers <br />serving each of the above areas were <br />contacted to provide estimates of average <br />lifetimes for various plumbing fixtures and <br />water-related household appliances. These <br />8stimates enabled a distribution to be <br />constructed of average years of life by type of <br />plumbing fixtures and appliances. A statistical <br />analysis compared the estimated mean <br />lifetime of these items between subgroups of <br /> <br />~ Sixty years is considered the normal life of a housing <br />unit. <br /> <br />5 <br />