My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00814
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:27:54 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:57:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/3/1959
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />A. Is the necessity for maintaining a natural condition in <br />forest lands more important than protecting these lands from fire? <br />If not, an exception should be provided whereby firebreaks and fire <br />control roads can be constructed by mechanical equipment in wilder- <br />ness a.reas. This would require an amendment of S. 1123. <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />, <br />B. Who should be responsible for ordering means for the <br />control of insects and diseases in the national forests? Under the <br />legislation, this could be done only by the Secretary of Agriculture. <br />At least in one instance- -the White River Area of Colorado--we have <br />a case where the length of time required to gain such approval permitt- <br />ed the spread of the spruce beetle to the point where thousands of acres <br />of valuable forest were completely destroyed. Is the necessity for <br />maintaining wilderness free from mechanical equipment more impor- <br />tant tllan permitting on-the-ground exceptions where a forest is threat- <br />ened by insects and diseases? <br /> <br />C. Is the maintenance of a wilderness condition more impor- <br />tant than the application of scientific mechanical means of watershed <br />management and protection to prevent floods and erosion and promote <br />useful vegetation? If so, amendments to the legislation are necess- <br />ary, since such is prohibited under the existing legislation. <br /> <br />D. Much money has been spent by the United States in learn- <br />ing methods of scientific forest management. Is the maintenance of <br />the wilderness condition in a given area more important than permis- <br />sion to utilize mechanical means to institute such practices of forest <br />management as will make our forests healthier, more useful, and <br />possibly increase the amount of water supply to be realized from such <br />forests? If the institution of proper forest management on our forests <br />is more important than the maintenance of a pure wilderness condition, <br />the legislation must be amended. <br /> <br />E. In the event of an emergency in wilderness areas, possibly <br />involving the lives of one or more persons, should emergency equip- <br />ment be permitted to go into the areas? If so, again, an amendment <br />would be necessary because such is prohibited under the existing <br />legislation. <br /> <br />F. Does the maintenance of a pure wilderness condition <br />require that airplanes be not permitted to fly over wilderness areas? <br />Under the existing legislation, it is my opinion that the operation of <br />aircraft over any of these areas, regardless of altitude and regardless <br />of the effect on transportation or military defense, would be prohibited. <br /> <br />.13. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.