Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLORADO <br /> <br />~~""" <br />F''I;: j <br /> <br />F"-/e <br />~if <br /> <br />Saturday, March 13, 1999 <br />. <br /> <br />23,'\. <br />~..,.,. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />DENVER <br /> <br />A DEBT-FREE <br />LIFE EXTOLLED <br />Michael Erbeck, a freelance fi- <br />nancial adviser, gave up his <br />credit cards - and his career as <br />a chemist at a nuclear power <br />plant - to preach the virtues of <br />living on cash. In a three-hour <br />seminar, Erbeck says he can <br />help people devise a plan to <br />eliminate debt, including home <br />mortgage, operate entirely on, <br />cash and still build for retirement. <br />STORY, 24A <br /> <br />THE DENVER Post <br />~;l <br /> <br />Dam d~lDolition_ hits stumbling blocks <br /> <br />By Nancy Lofholm <br />DanverPostStaffWr~er <br /> <br />GRAND JUNCTION - Building <br />a dam can be a monstrous under- <br />taking, with all the bureaucratic <br />red tape, the monumental costs <br />and environmental tug-ai-war. <br />Tearing a tiny one down can be <br />about as tough. <br />The U.8. Bureau of Reclamation <br />wants to remove a century-old, 8- <br />foot-high dam on the Colorado Riv- <br />er near Palisade -" a dam that <br />hasn't been used for more than 75 <br />years. <br />But the federal agency has run <br /> <br />into a series of snags. <br /> <br />A hydropower property claim, <br />possible landslides and water-sup- <br />ply issues all stand in the way of <br />the bureau's efforts to tear down <br />the Price..stubb Dam so that two <br />endangered fish species, the razor. <br />back sucker and the pike minnow <br />(formerly caBed the squawfish), <br />can move upstream to traditional <br />habitat that extends about 60 miles <br />to Rifle, said Brent UHenberg, the <br />bureau's Grand Junction chief of <br />environmental resources. <br /> <br />The dam was built to supply wa- <br />ter to the east end of the' Grand <br /> <br />Valley at the turn of the century <br />but was abandoned when the High~ <br />line canal was built in the 1920s. <br />For years, recreational boaters <br />who can't use that stretch of the <br />Colorado have pressured the bu- <br />reau to remove the dam. <br /> <br />But the biggest stumbling block <br />to the dam's removal is a Telluride <br />man's plan to develop hydropower <br />from the Price-Stubb. <br /> <br />Eric Jacobsen, a private hydro- <br />. power developer, filed for a permit <br />in 1992 from the Federal -Energy <br />Regulatory Commission to install a <br />hydropower generator on the dam. <br /> <br />His permit was approved before <br />the razorback sucker was listed as <br />an endangered species, so he had to <br />file an amended permit. The statilS <br />of his permit is now in question. <br /> <br />"Until we figure out if Mr. Ja- <br />cobsen has a valid property inter- <br />est, we can't do anything. We've <br />. been waiting for months to find <br />this out from the commission. It's <br />very frustrating," Uilenberg said. <br /> <br />Another concern, which may be <br />easier to remedy, is that removal <br />of the dam wi!! leave the backup <br />pumping system for Grand Valley <br />drinking water high and dry. ute <br /> <br />Water, which serves 60,000 resi,. <br />dents of the valley, has a pumping <br />station that can pull the water <br />from the river above the dam. Th.e <br />station is used in emergencies and <br />is currently being used to deliver <br />water while the company builds f\ <br />new water line from Grand June.. <br />tion to the Grand Mesa, the prima- <br />ry source of Grand Valley Water. <br />Ute water needs to use the PUDlp <br />station for most of the next three <br />years while the new line is com.. <br />pleted. <br /> <br />Ute officials have expressed <br /> <br />Please see DAM on 25.A <br /> <br />Series of obstacles delaying. <br />Price-Stubb Dam demolition <br /> <br />removal. Studies showed that re- <br />moving the dam shouldn't affect <br />the slide area above railroad <br />tracks and the river, but the bu- <br />reau is planning to install some <br />monitoring equipment in the hill- <br />side if the dam comes down. <br /> <br />In the event that the dam can't <br />. be torn down, the bureau has two <br />other options. One would be to I <br />notch the dam so fish could swim : <br />.through. The other would be to <br />build a fish ladder over the dam. <br />Uilenberg said removal would be <br />the _cheapest and most effective op- <br />tion. <br /> <br />DAM from Page 23A <br /> <br />alarm about losing their backup <br />and said it would cost $10 million <br />to build a new station, but Uilen- <br />berg said the bureau can fix that. <br />by running a pipeline through an <br />existing corridor under Interstate <br />70. The diversion would cost <br />$100,000 to $200,000, and Uilen- <br />berg said the bureau would pick up <br />the tab. <br /> <br />The bureau has also had to foot <br />the bill for geological studies of an <br />active slide area along the river <br />~at could be affected by the dam: <br />