Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.,"Ii <br /> <br />JWeUowners IJr <br />thaIleng. ing ~q, <br />'. .' (>d <br />.water rules \ QJ <br /> <br />By Patrick O'Ori5coll <br />Deriver Post Staff Writer <br />CAN"ON CITY - Tougb new re- <br />strictions lor larm wells in lbe Ar- <br />kansas River Valley, backed by a <br />;ne'lly signed Colorado law, lace a Ie- <br />.gal .!'hallenge belore tbey ever lake <br />eflect. <br />; Aii)lttorney for six larm lamilies <br />~ill :~gue in water court bere today <br />lbat.!be new rules - adopted to belp <br />i>afliack Kansas lor water that Cola- <br />hdalllegally diverjed for 40 years - <br />-are arbitrary, capricious and amount <br />~"fgovernment "laking" 01 private <br />p~y. . .. <br />'. The rules will severely reduce or <br />'shut off as many as'I,500 wells in tbe <br />;river's lower valley unI~ tbeir own- <br />",rsobuy augmentation supplies to re- <br />Y.J!lce tbe. losses. '. Tbe rules were <br />:dralted by State Engineer Hal Simp- <br />;son and. backed bi SB .124 wilb new <br />..tate. money,. more stafl and stirr <br /><finei! for violators. Gov. Roy Romer <br />'signed tbe bill MarCb I. <br />: But Castle Rock lawyer Kevin <br />'Pratt claims his clients "will be dev- <br />:astated" by the ~ell restrictions, <br />+ :wbicb be,ssid will cut their well use <br />:by 94.5 percent to 100 percent. <br />. 'ITb'1Y bave built farms, broken out <br />:Iand, created lbeir bomes and tbeir <br />daritiJies on the basis 0/ using wells to <br />. <br /> <br />-'--- '~-'_,;.'':':::-.:/;:'".>,:' <br /> <br />WATER trom Page 1 B <br /> <br />peets Colorado to "come into compli- <br />ance as soon as possible." <br />Pratt and attorneys for tbe state <br />will argue several pre-trial motions <br />here today before District 2 Water <br />Court Judge John Anderson, who will <br />hear the full case beginning April 8. <br />The rules originally were to take <br /> <br />rl <br /> <br />irrigate their crops," said Pratt. <br />"These rules will tell lbem tbey can <br />no longer use tbeir wells, and iftbey <br />want to continue. . . they must go out. <br />and buy, in essence, a whole new set <br />of water rights." <br />Pratt said 80 otber families bave <br />expressed support for the objectors. <br />But most of the valley's affected well <br />owners are joining water-user groups <br />that will huy outside supplies to re- <br />place what they bad pumped. <br />Tbe rules came after the U.S. Su- . <br />preme Court agreed last year with a <br />special master's finding'tbat Colora- . <br />do broke its 1948 pact witb Kansas by <br />laking too mucb water. ThoUsands of <br />wells drilled since 1948 were blamed <br />for shrinking tbe river's flows, <br />Tbe special master, appointed by <br />tbe justices, next will recommend <br />how Colorado must correct lbe prob- . <br />lem and repay Kansas. <br />.Pratt argues tbe rules are arbi- <br />trary because tbey exempt smaller <br />wells that serve homes and livestock <br />ponds. <br />He also complained that lbe slate <br />"leapt. too quick to t~e task" and did <br />not need to rush lbe.rules into effect. <br />But Will Burt: the deputy state en- <br />gineer, said the special master ex- <br /> <br />'C' -.- -. Please see WATER on 4B <br />"'\: .' <br /> <br />.......;. <br /> <br />-. "'.. ',r- :"':''1".:::~: <br /> <br />effect AprH 1, b~rtbe state will delay <br />Implementmg tbem until the court <br />case is decided. <br />"Our hope is to win in the trial <br />~ourt," said Pratt. "Our expectation <br />IS, the rules will be tied up in litiga- <br />tion for years." <br />But the state already has gathered <br />and IS analyzing pumping data to set <br />specific limits for each well. <br /> <br />~II!! ......--- <br />