Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />The Sacramento Bee <br />Friday, December 12,1997 A7 <br /> <br />San Diego makes deal <br />for Imperial Valley ag water <br /> <br />By Paula Story <br />Associated Press <br /> <br />Sk\" DIEGO - San Diego and Imperial <br />Valley agreed Thursday to the terms of a <br />water transfer program that could keep <br />waler flowing into San Diego County for <br />the next 75 years and beyond. <br />The pact between the San Diego Coun- <br />ty Water Authority and Imperial Irriga- <br />tion District aims to send conserved agri- <br />cultural water from the Imperial Valley <br />to ever-thirsty San Diegans. <br />The agreement is now open for public <br />review and both boards will consider final <br />approval in February. <br />Proponents laud the agreement as an <br />historic model for California's 4.4 Plan. <br />which savs the state must reduce its take <br />from the 'Colorado River. <br />The federal government and Califor- <br />nia's neighbors - Arizona and other <br />states along the Colorado - say lhe Gold- <br />en State is sucking down more than Its <br />share and must work to find alternatives. <br />"We"'e always gone to some other part <br />of California - or some other area - for <br />our water," said Sen. David Kelley of <br />Idylhnld. <br />''Theres no place else to go." <br />California currently takes around 5.3 <br />million acre feet of water each year, al- <br />though its allotted amount is 4.4 million. <br />An acre-foot is enough water for the typi- <br />cal needs of two families each year. <br />Scores of beaming negotiators attended <br />a Thursdav news conference to explain <br />the details -oflhe conserved water plan. <br />The politically charged deal has been <br />as much about moving a mountain of poli~ <br />tics. paperwork and economic interests as <br />it has been about moving water. <br />"This was once viewed by many as <br />something that just wasn't going to hap- <br />pen:' said Chris Fraham, chair of the San <br />Diego water board. "Now it is widely rec- <br />ognized as something that is absolutely <br />essential. . . not only to California but to <br />all the weslern states." <br />I The initial term of the partnership is <br />45 years, with the option of a 30-year ex- <br />ten~lOn by either party. <br />The two could pOSSIbly continue the <br />rle3i beyond that dJ.te if both parties re- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />negotiate. <br />It provides for a m..,pmum transfer of <br />200,000 acre feet each year, with a mini- <br />mum of130,000. <br />Both parties would bear their share of <br />any water shortage, and environmental <br />contingencies are built into the plan. <br />"To me, this whole thing is about trust <br />and about team," said Lloyd Allen, vice <br />president of the Imperial Irrigation Dis- <br />trict Board of Directors. <br />More than two years in the making, the <br />plan still hinges on the giant Metropoli- <br />tan Water District's wheeling rates - the <br />amount they'will charge to send the wa- <br />ter through their aqueduct and pipeline <br />facility to get it from the Imperial Valley <br />to San Diego. <br />Under Thursday's proposal, Imperial <br />Valley water would cost San Diego an e5- <br />timated $250 per acre foot. San Diego <br />now pays MWD more than $400. The new <br />deal ofTers a declining discount starting <br />at 25 percent that would end at 5 percent <br />in the 17th year. '. <br />The San Diego water authority h'as <br />been negotiating the wheeling cost with <br />MWD since January 1996, but the two <br />have been at an impasse. <br />Gov. Pete Wilson signed a bill in Octo- <br />ber that says the State Department of <br />Water Resources will recommend th'e <br />terms of a wheeling agreement if one <br />can't be reached. <br />MWD ana the San Diego water author- <br />ity are scheduled 10 meet Saturdav and <br />officials said a deal could be ann~~nced <br />following that meeting. <br /> <br />~~~\. <br />). <br />