Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Overruns of several hundred percent l"Ire <br />I <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />Finally, I would like to comment on a major problem I <br />This is the problem i <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />I significantly increase the estimated costs of the tunnel. <br /> <br />2 Further, experience in Colorado (the Eisenhower tunnel) ~d <br /> <br />3 o~ler areas makes any person highly suspect of official, <br /> <br />4 original cost estimates. <br /> <br />S not uncommon. <br /> <br />What would a hundred percent cost overrun on <br /> <br />6 the tunnel do to the cost benefit ratio? <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />8 that is not discussed in the statement. <br /> <br />9 of siltation in a reservoir. It is not generally understood <br />10 by the public that any reservoir has a definite life history <br />II before it fills in with sediment that is trapped by the d~. <br />12 The nearby example of the Paonia Reservoir is not comZ orti.ng . <br />13 No figures are presented in the draft statement es~ting <br />14 life span but sooner or later this reservoir will beco~ a <br />IS vast mud flat completely ruining the valley and producing <br />16 <br />major ecological impact on the entire Soap Cree~ drainage <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />Alt.hough this may take fifty or one hundred or even <br /> <br />system. <br /> <br />18 <br />two hundred years, it matters not; do lie have t.11.e right to <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />leave ~lis unsightly mess to future generations? <br /> <br />;..hat are <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />the Bureau's plans for this? <br /> <br />This is one of the aost 00 auti f' 1 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />valleys in ~le area and it seems more than cri~inal to change <br />it in this way." <br />AS I say, he apologized for his error in the last <br />statement, but he feels a statement of a three percent loss <br />of reservoir capacity due to siltation in a hundred years is <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />25 <br />