My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00713
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:27:27 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:53:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.300.50
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Advisory Council
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/17/1992
Author
USDA
Title
Colorado River Salinity Control Program - Federal Accomplishments Report for Fiscal Year 1992
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o <br />-.J <br />c.c <br />00 <br /> <br />Fish and wildlife Service <br />Colorado River Salinity Control Program Accomplishments <br />for Fiscal Year 1992 <br /> <br />Planning assistance for the uncompahgre System Optimization and <br />Joint Use Study (East Side Laterals), Hammond Unit (San Juan), and <br />Price San-Rafael Rivers Unit was completed in 1992. Most of the <br />necessary Coordination Act reporting and Endangered Species Act <br />compliance has also been completed for all three projects except for <br />East Side Laterals. National Environmental policy Act compliance <br />for those projects is now being completed by Reclamation and SCS. <br /> <br />FWS'S Reno Field Office commented on SCS's notice of intent to <br />prepare an EIS for the Moapa Valley Unit, and on the March 1992 <br />review draft of the EIS. The draft EIS was prepared and submitted <br />to the public for review in July 1992. The Reno Field Office <br />provided draft comments to FWS's Region 1 Office for submittal to <br />the Office of Environmental Affairs. The document was found to be <br />inadequate in its discussion of the potential for impacts to <br />wetlands and waters of the United States under jurisdiction of the <br />Army Corps of Engineers. There also was no assurance that <br />compensation would be provided for impacts to wetlands lost as a <br />result of the project. FWS recommended that the section on ~ <br />cumulative impacts be expanded to include a discussion of overall <br />wetland losses in the Moapa Valley through past actions, including <br />filling of wetlands, water diversions, capping of springs, ground- <br />water pumping, and agricultural practices that have altered <br />wetlands. <br /> <br />Reclamation's 3-year feasibility study of the Lower Virgin River <br />Unit project for salinity control and water resource development <br />involves a cooperative effort between the Las Vegas Valley District <br />(District) and Reclamation to divert water from the Virgin River <br />basin to the Las Vegas Valley area. The project is a portion of a <br />larger plan by the District to import water from throughout <br />southeastern Nevada to the Las Vegas Valley. FWS, BLM, National <br />Park Service, and Bureau of Indian Affairs are working cooperatively <br />on studies to assess the impact of the proposed withdrawals on <br />resources managed by the Department of the Interior (DOl). FWS's <br />Reno Field Office has been designated to coordinate with Reclamation <br />and to serve on the Water Supply Work Group, an ad hoc committee of <br />technical representatives formed by Reclamation's planning branch <br />for the project. Both the District and Reclamation have contacted <br />several resource agencies, as well as the Virgin River Fishes <br />Recovery Team, in an effort to identify potential environmental <br />impacts. The Reno Field Office will begin to prepare a Coordination <br />Act Report for this project during 1993. <br /> <br />FWS'S concerns generally remain focused on wetland losses and the <br />voluntary replacement of wildlife habitat values foregone. FWS's <br />concerns over the lack of progress on the 1,200-acre SCS obligation <br />on the Grand Valley Unit were made known to Reclamation, which had <br />agreed to underwrite the SCS replacement effort. Following a <br />February 1992 meeting, FWS agreed to allow extra time for the <br />voluntary replace-ment program to work, provided appropriate <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.