My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00684
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00684
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:27:18 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:52:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.16
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/2000
Author
Webb et al.
Title
Sediment Delivery by Ungaged Tributaries of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon Arizona
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Grand Canyon respond similarly and developed a <br />climatic variability relation between summer <br />rainfall (fig. 4a) and sediment yield. <br />We evaluated the effects of climatic variability <br />on streamflow in eight small drainages on Black <br />Mesa for which annual sediment-yield data are <br />available for 10-12 years of record (table 4). <br />Equation (2) was used to develop a standardized <br />summer (July-September) rainfall index for 1985- <br />1997, which corresponds to the period of record for <br />sediment yield for the Black Mesa gaging stations. <br />Data came from weather stations surrounding Black <br />Mesa - Betatakin National Monument, Chinle, <br />Kearns Canyon, and Monument Valley - instead <br />of the weather stations in the Grand Canyon region <br />(table 3). We then standardized the sediment-yield <br />data for Black Mesa with the regression equation: <br /> <br />Q,BM= -0.046 + 0.888 . PBM, R2 = 0.41, (13) <br /> <br />where Q,BM = standardized Black Mesa annual <br />sediment yields and P 8M is the standardized <br />precipitation index for the weather stations near <br />Black Mesa. Similar regression equations <br />developed for winter precipitation and annual <br />precipitation were not significant. <br />We assume that equation (14) represents the <br />expected sediment-yield response to climatic <br />variability in Grand Canyon, and that the <br />interannual variability of sediment yield in Grand <br />Canyon was of a similar magnitude to the <br />interannual variability of sediment yield on Black <br />Mesa. The time series of sediment yield from the <br />ungaged tributaries in a reach was calculated as: <br /> <br />Qitl = Q,' (Cv' (-0.046 + 0.888' P,(t)) + I), (14) <br /> <br />where Q,(t) = the time series of sediment yield for <br />each year t, Q, = the average annual sediment yield <br />for a reach (table 6), Cv = a coefficient of variation <br />for the sediment data, and P,(t) = the time series of <br />standardized precipitation presented in figure 4a. <br />The average Cv for the eight sediment records from <br />Black Mesa is 1.3; the Cv for the Paria River is 0.9. <br />Using this method, we calculated the annual <br />variation in streamflow sediment yield for Reaches <br />AandB(fig.15). The larger peaks (1940 and 1980) <br />and troughs (mid 1970s) replicate a pattern seen in <br />Topping's (1997) calculations for fine sediment <br />input from the Paria River. Total sediment yield is <br />increased 5 to 20 percent when accounting for <br /> <br />debris flows, (table 11) which are assumed not to <br />vary with climate. <br />This approach clearly has problems that <br />diminish its usefulness. Among them, we assume <br />that climate can be adequately measured by rain <br />gages that are fairly distant from a watershed, and <br />that the variability in summer rainfall is reasonably <br />synchronous across the region of interest. Given the <br />localized nature of the summer thunderstorms, that <br />may not always be the case. We also assume that the <br />relation between sediment yield and summer <br />precipitation for Black Mesa, which is relatively <br />weak, is directly transferable to the Grand Canyon <br />region and adequately describes the relation <br />between sediment yield in ungaged tributaries and <br />regional climate. In addition, we assume that the <br />coefficient of variation of sediment yield in Grand <br />Canyon tributaries is similar to that of Black Mesa. <br />Finally, we assume that annual variation in <br />sediment yield is completely controlled by <br />variability in summer precipitation. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Sediment input to the Colorado River in Grand <br />Canyon, Arizona, is a valuable resource required to <br />sustain terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Since the <br />closure of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963,_sediment <br />enters Grand Canyon from 4 major tributaries with <br />gaging stations and 768 small, ungaged tributaries. <br />Estimation of sediment yield from ungaged <br />tributaries is a critical element in the development <br />of a sediment mass balance for Grand Canyon. <br />However, estimation of sediment yield is <br />complicated by the fact that sediment is delivered <br />by debris flows as well as by streamflow floods, <br />requiring development of new techniques for <br />assessing sediment yield. <br />A total of768 tributaries deliver sediment to the <br />Colorado River between Glen Canyon Dam and the <br />Grand Wash Cliffs (river miles -15 to 276). The 32 <br />tributaries between the dam and Lee's Ferry <br />produce only streamflow floods whereas 736 <br />tributaries in Grand Canyon produce streamflow <br />floods and debris flows. We used three techniques <br />to estimate annual streamflow sediment yield from <br />ungaged tributaries to Grand Canyon, all of which <br />gave very similar results. The flood-frequency <br />technique depends on numerous untested <br /> <br />DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.