Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"0) <br />:1 <br />,..... <br />..-! <br />'-:-J <br />C;) <br /> <br />16. Spe~,ing €Gne~a1ly_ the future development and <br />imp~ovemontof i~rigation in the San Luis Valley. under the tarmsof the <br />, ~eoamnonded delivery sohedules. must be QOoompaniodby more e:x:tensiV1l <br /> <br />And ef:!'eotive drainll.j;;e. To the extont that additional returns may be <br />brpught into the river, thus to satisfy \ the terms of tho proposed <br />statoUne deliveries. to that SIllllO ext<lnt lnay water OOl1uUlltption be <br /> <br />inoreased. Sinoe pr~sont uses ar0 ~Qught to be rooogni2ed and <br />proteoted. and sinoe the opportunity for needful fut'1.lre dovelopments ' <br />appear to be, not only permitted under tho proposed oompaot. but <br />physioally possible under the reo~mnendedBohodules.the proposed <br />oompaot should reoeive the united support and approval'of tb$ water <br />users and their roprelllnltati yeS in the San I.uis Valley. <br />17. The obligaton Q.f' Colorado to deliver wator to th& <br /> <br />Colorlldo-lfw MexioQ s-bateline vrould 00 the sum of tho quanti ties set <br />1'orth in two separate sohodules. eaoh of wh:toh invQlvl'I the maintenancG <br />ot sevorll.l g>.ging stations. While the use of separate sohedules may <br />1'aoilitate apportionment, as among SQU Luis Valley viator ullors. of <br /> <br />the relative respon.ibi1ities for mooting the obligation of the State. ' <br /> <br /> <br />at the same time suohmQtters, of into~al QPportionment should, so <br /> <br /> <br />1'ar as po.sibleJ be omitted from tho intElrstll.te oompMt. <br />.. <br /> <br />18. The engineering adv1so~s suggest thLIt ~ be mado, , <br /> <br /> <br />in the Oompaot. tor review after five yoll.r8J and adjustments. within <br /> <br /> <br />the intent of the Oompaot. of the obligations 01' the soveral Statos. <br /> <br />-7- <br /> <br />...,'.,"",-.,,, <br />.<,' <br /> <br />.'. '..~.".. ' <br />, <br />