WSP00641 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. r Y!S!!!! . _'IlIlIlITS DPlMIITIOll CODIIS '" U' to DDES ~rait. are reviewed under two dirt.rent c:rlteri.. under POr\lll pollcy; th... being IIWllcipal 1") and indu.trial. In 01'4.1' tor a pendtt.. to be in cQllP11uce UDder the .unlclpa.l criterlu.. the iller.... iD concentration between inflow and outflow CaD DOt be gr..ter than .00 -0-/1. "Orull industrial. criteri_ require. that DO induatrial \War discharge. .ore tball 1.00 tana/day. Under l'orua policy there CaD be granted exceptions to th~. U,aitationa by the Stat... The following give. an explanation of' the current atatua of tbe NPDES peraita. Becau.. at any given U.IM INDy of the approxiaate 600 penlite identified 1D this liet are being revieved. r.1..ued. and/or tendo.ted. and new diacharge penlite .re being tiled. this li.t auat be conaidered a. being subject to frequent cbugs. COLOlWlO RlYEll 1Wl1X SALIXIT'l COIITIlOL PORIM _IClPAL (M) IluDlcipal u..r ill c~lianc. with Poru. policy, (M-l) ..rait has expired or been revoked. discharge. (M-2) Pe~ttee ia not currently di8charging. Ilo (M-3) Me.aure.ent of TDS ia not currently required. but tbe atate plan. to require ae..urements of both inflow and outflow when tbe p.~it i. rei..ued. (M-4) Me..urellents of inflow are not consistent witb J'orUII policy: (M.4A) Theretore. it is not known whetber or DOt this Municipal ueer is in compliance. (M-48) Bowev.r'. sincs outflow concentration i. less than 500 lag/l it ia presuaed tbat this pendt is Dot in violatioD of the <400 mg/l incr..... (M.5) This perJllit ia in violation of Porum policy in that th.re is an increaae in concentration by >400 -VII over tbe source w.ters. (M-SA) The .tate i. currently working to bring th~ into co.pliance. (M-6) Thi. para! t is uncleI' tbe and tbey report <400 lncre..e in TDS. .upervision of BPA ppa iocre.ental (M-7) Insufficient data to know the at.tu. of this pendt. . Perait i.sued to a tederal agency or an Indian tribe aDd the reaponsibility of EPA. DlDUS1'IUAL (I) Industrial u.er in cOIIpliance with l'orua policy . (1.1) Perai t haa expired or been revoked. diacharge. Ilo (1.2) 'eraittee i. Dot currently di.charging. (1.3) "ea.Ur~ent of TOS i. not currently required. but the .tate Plan. to require ....ure..nt. ot both volu.e and conc.ntration of outflow wh.n tb. perait is rei.aued. (1.4) lither conc.ntration or voluae of outflow are not currently being ..de a. stipUlated. thus the perait 1. in violation of Porua policy, It ia not know if tbe pend t ia in exce.. of the <1.00 ton./day requirement. (1-5) Thia pendt ia in violation of Forwa policy in that they are discharging >1.00 tona/day of .alta. (I.SA) No provi.ion has been .ade allowing this violation of Poru. policy. (I-58) Though eliacbuge ia >1.00 tona/day. in keeping with porua policy the diacharger haa dellOnatrated the .alt reduction is DOt practicable and tbe requir...nt has been "aived. U.5C) Thia peEWit use. .atera for their theraal energy. Only heat i. extracted aDd thua the .alt and ..ater wbich are di.charged iDto the river would have done 80 naturally. They are covered by the Foru.. policy OD intercepted groundwaters. U.5D) Thi. per.it i. for a fi.h hatchery and _1 though they are diacbarging > 1.00 ton./day. tbe u.. ot tbe water ia a one. tiae pa.. through use and not >1.00 ton./day of aalt is added by the use. (1.52) Thia peraJ.t is for the interception and paa.age ot ground waters and thua is excepted under the Porua' a policy on ground-water interception. (1.6) This penait i. under the supervision of EPA and they report a elischarge of < 1. 00 tons/day of salt. (1.7) Insufficient data to know the current atatu. ot this per.it. ; l : >~M