My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00634
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00634
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:27:01 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:51:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/30/1951
Title
News Articles/Press Releases: 1951-1952
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c-, <br />0': <br />- <br />~ <br /> <br />Progress Report <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />N~Yfs ~f Ari.zo~a' s Water Fight <br />.,'_ I \','.' / <br />"''if -">, <br />/; <br />I /~", <br /> <br />By tlowarel J. Smith, Executive Secretary <br />Central Arizona Project AllOCiation <br />510 Goodrich "'lId;.g . Ph... 2-1112 <br /> <br />P1Pt'Ee~VED <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />.. <br />, <br /> <br />JUt'! 2 2 :951 <br />(RePUblica+~~"A. <br />ailIItIV.iw 10... <br /> <br />Jime 11, 1951 <br /> <br />SENATE APPROVES AUTHORIZATICN BILL <br /> <br />The United States Senate reaffirmed its belief in the need and economic feasi- <br />bility of the Central Arizona Project last week when it passed an authorization <br />bill by the overwhelming vote of 50-28. It....s the second time in as many years <br />that the senior body had given approval to the project, One amendment was voted <br />to the measure, providing that construction may not begin until after t.he current <br />emergency period~ The bill already contained a prov1.sion that any state, feeling <br />it might be injured by construction of the project, can seek recourse in the Su- <br />preme Court. Hence, it now more than meets any argument thus far introduced by <br />California against its passage. <br /> <br />The measure now goes to the House of Representatives, There, the Committee on <br />Interior and Insular Affairs on April 18 voted not to consider a companion bill <br />until the Colorado River argument had been settled by negotiation or by the Suj:xEme <br />Court. The committee, which succumbed to Califom_iafs blandishments, overlooked <br />the fact that Arizona three times has sought adjudication there. In each instance <br />the Court refused to hear the case on grounds no one was injured, nor faced threat <br />of injury, California opposed the suit in each instance. <br /> <br />Arizona has made many concessions in its fight to obtain Colorado River -water. <br />She must have ....ter to s1ll'vive. It is hoped that the prestige of Senate passage <br />will lead the House committee to T&ronsider its previous action, and give approval <br />to the Senate version. <br /> <br />llEVAn\' S CLAIIIS <br /> <br />AS expected, Nevada' B Senator George W. Malone made a plea for 900,000 acre-feet <br />of Colorado River water during the Senate debete, despite the 300,000 acre-feet <br />allocated by the Law of the River to that state. Nevada apparently hasn't awalened <br />to the fact that California has gI. van every notice it intends to grab all the <br />water in the West, if possible. <br /> <br />CALIFOJJIIIA lIAS ENOUGll WATERl <br /> <br />Senator Hayden made much, during the Senate dehate, of a statement by Celifornia <br />State En~ineer A. D. Edmonston that the Coast state has sufficient water within <br />its borders to meet all its needs. Edmonston pointed out, in a talk before the <br />state chamber of commerce, that 10,000,000 acre-feet of ....ter is flowing to the <br />S6 a in Northern California and could be diverted to the southern part of the <br />state. . <br /> <br />Blithely ignoring lack of water in 'its sister state, Arizona, farmers in the area <br />around Blythe, are developing 10,000 acres of uncultivated land in the Palo Verde <br />district bordering the Colorado. Meanwhile, two sources in Celifornia admitted <br />water is being wasted in that state: <br /> <br />Dr. F. J. Veihmeyer, University of Celifornia irrigation expert, said in many <br />cases the state I 5 farmers could double their acreage W wise usage of water. As <br />example, he cited the eight to ten cotton crop irrigations each season, when three <br />should be sufficient. The California Farmer, supporting Dr. Veihmeyer J contended <br />such conditions exist "a11 over the state". <br /> <br />CENTRAL ARIZONA PRO.JIICT ASSOCIATION DIRItCTORS <br />WAYNE N. AKIN, ""'IrSIOIrNT . A. I.. BARTUTT . HatBDtT H. nOWN . VICTOII1. COIIBIl1.I. . <br />CLEON T. I(NAI'P . W,.. UNIr . II. H. MCIlLHANItY . !'RANI( M. n'l'W1I . HUCiH C. c;IIUWIrI.t. . .I0HN M. .IAC;OBB <br />DEAN IITANLEY . D I. IITAPLJIY . ltODatlCX.l. McNUU.IN . ..It, NOHTliIOMIrIl'r . .10ft",. NUTT . IIINIn". SALMON <br />__ . . .I.IiNNC.T~~~_~ .IlrnIrH.UDAI.I.' AHTHONYVAfIIWA.......... A.M.WAIlD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.