Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c <br />"" <br />~. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"j <br />FACT SHEET CONCERNING THE CEKTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT (Ml:ly 2;5, 1951) <br />WHAT IS THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT? <br /> <br />'~ <br /> <br />- <br />r:". <br />,Co <br />c. <br /> <br />The Central Arizona Project is a reclamation project. It would bring 1,200,000 acre- <br />~eet of water from the Colorado River to Central Arizona, and vrould generate 750,000 <br />kilowatts of power at 13rir:ge Canyon ram. The water would be stored at Bridge Canyon <br />oem, then would flow dow'1"~i.vE;r, generating power at Hoover and Davis Dams, and would <br />be lifted from the rive~ near Parker, Arizona. The pump lift WOQld be 985 feet. The <br />~ter then would flow b:T gt.avity th:::,ough a 245-.mile system of aqueducts and canals to <br />~storically cultivated iarnls direly in need, because of the worst drouth in history, <br />0:( a supplemental water supply obtainable only from Arizona's share of the Colorado <br />R;j.ver. <br /> <br />WHAT WILL THE C~ITRAL ARIZONA PROJECT COST? <br /> <br />The Central Arizona Project .nll cost) according to present estimates, $788,000,000. <br />This cost vdll vary with prices of materials and labor. It has been estimated as low <br />801$ $596,000,000. <br /> <br />HOW WILL THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT PAY FOR ITSELF? <br /> <br />The Central Arizona Project vr.ill be paid for by re'~nues from the use of water and <br />J;lower. Only It percent of the cost will be nonreimbursable directly to the Federal <br />T~easury, and that It percent vall be reimbursed indirectly many, many times. This <br />P~oject is planned on precisely the same standard~california's Central Valley, <br />Colorado's Big-Thompson, and other big, sOlli,d Projects. <br /> <br />WHAT ABOUT THE COLORAOO RIVER WATER FIGHT? <br /> <br />For nearly 30 years California has blocked all attempts by Arizona to obtain her <br />r;tghtful share of Colorado River wat'3r. The Law of the River, establishing distribu- <br />tion of its vmters, includes the 'Santa Fe Compact, the Boulder Canyon Project Act, <br />the California Self-Limitation Act, and state contracts vdth the Federal government. <br />This Law gives California 4,400,000 acre-feet of Colorado River water, and Arizona, <br />2,800,000, plus half the surplus to each state after October 1, 1963. The essence of <br />the ,mole Colorado River quarrel is that California seeks to block reclamation deve- <br />lopment of the river in the hope that eventually all the Colorado River can be Cali- <br />fornia's. In this bold attempt, California has seemed at times to be fighting only <br />Arizona's right to delivery of 1,200,000 acre-feet of contracted waters; actually, <br />California'S threat extends to every other Basin State. <br /> <br />~\lHAT THE CE!'Y'l'RAL ARIZOl-iA PROJECT IS NOT 1 <br /> <br />California propagandists have said many things, mostly false, about the Central Ari- <br />zona Project---and have said them often through the mouths of du]:S s and stooges. One <br />of the most vddely distributed capsules of California truth-distortions says the Pro- <br />ject would "use water it doesn't own, lift it nearly twice as high as the Washington <br />Monument, convey it more than 200 miles at a cost to Federal taxpayers of $2 billion, <br />to irrigate 200,000 acres of privately ovmed land on which to raise crops already in <br />surplus", The truth is that Arizona is so certain of her right to the disputed water <br />that she has tried thrice to get SUpreme Court settlement and provides an avenue of <br />Court action in the present bill. The aqueduct length and the pump lift height have <br />been proved feasible by California vdth an aqueduct similar in length and a pump lift <br />twice as high. The cost to the taxpayers will be not a cent, for the Project is to- <br />tally reimbursable directly or indirectly. The crops raised are normally specialty <br />crops, not in surplus; and the acreage is 750,000,8011 historically cultivated. <br /> <br />THE S1'ATUS OF THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT <br /> <br />A joL~t Federal-State survey has deemed it economically and engineeringly feasible, <br />and Congressional authorization is being sought. Hearings have been held and the <br />U. S. Senate has acted favorably, not once but twice. <br />