My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00625
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:58 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:51:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP Annual Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/12/1995
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
1994 Annual Reports Package Part 1
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In 1994, we caught 115 different squawfish in the Colorado River <br />between Westwater Canyon and Palisade including the lower 2,2 miles <br />of the Gunnison River, Forty-nine had been previously captured <br />during 1990-1993, In the Colorado River downstream of Westwater, 69 <br />different squawfish were caught; 13 of these were captured in <br />previous years, Three of the recaptured squawfish in the upper river <br />had moved there from the lower river. In 1992 we found two other <br />squawfish in the upper river that had previously been marked in the <br />lower river. To date, no fish marked in the upper river have later <br />been captured in the lower river. Migrations of young adults <br />upstream suggests a dispersal mechanism for young raised in the <br />downstream nursery areas. Those that reach the upper river <br />apparently stay there. Presumably this is in response to the better <br />adult habitat located in the upper river. Analysis of scales from a <br />sample of young adults that have become numerous in recent years <br />indicated that what was previously thought to be a strong cohort, was <br />actually made up of fish hatched in 1985, 1986, and 1987. However, <br />most of the young adults apparently were hatched in 1986. <br /> <br />The spring runoff period ended abruptly in mid-June before the <br />sampling regime ended. Unlike previous years, squawfish moved to <br />their spawning sites during mid-June while we were still sampling. <br />As a result, we happened onto a previously unknown spawning site in <br />the middle of the Grand Valley. We captured 19 different squawfish <br />in a 0.3 mi reach; 16 of these were captured from one pool. This <br />pool was associated with a cobble bar formed at the mouth of a side <br />channel created during the 1993 high spring runoff period, Water <br />temperatures were 19.0-23.5 C. Another possible spawning site was <br />located by Bob Burdick on the Gunnison River just downstream of the <br />Redlands plunge pool; 14 squawfish were captured there during the <br />last week of June and the first week of July when water temperatures <br />were 19,5-21.0 C, A spawning site near the Colorado/Utah state-line, <br />identified during previous years, yielded three adult squawfish, <br />Downstream of Westwater Canyon two other possible spawning sites were <br />located; four running ripe males were caught at one site and three <br />were caught at another site, Water temperatures were 21-23 C. Both <br />sites were between Cisco Landing and Fish Ford, <br /> <br />VII. Recommendations: We recommend that studies such as this one be <br />repeated periodically in the Colorado River so that trends in <br />population status can be more accurately monitored. The overall <br />population is small, making it more vulnerable to extirpation than in <br />the Green River Basin where squawfish are more numerous. To <br />calculate a population estimate, a minimum of three years of data <br />collection is required; to calculate a survival rate at least four <br />years are required. The next four-year study should probably <br />commence after five years have lapsed since the end of this study. A <br />combination of backwater trammel netting and shoreline electrofishing <br />should be employed. Although netting is more productive and possibly <br />less harmful to the fish, some reaches do not have sufficient numbers <br />of backwaters to sample. In addition, years of low spring runoff <br />result in inadequate flooding of many backwaters in the lower river, <br /> <br />VIII. Project Status: This project is on track and on-going through FY 95, <br />The final report will be written in 1995. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.