Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOLORADO RIVER S'l'ORAGE PROJEO'l' <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />The use of the 83.percent efficiency factor would help prevent this <br />type of payment. The 83.percent efficiency factor is selected be. <br />cause that is the efficiency used in the computations to determine <br />the amount of Hoover firm energy as defined in the "General Regula. <br />tions for Generation' and Sale of Power in Accordance With the <br />Boulder Oanyon projbct Adjustment Act." . <br />The way is left o'pen for the Secretary to determine how the <br />allowance would be accomplished. For example, the Secretary might <br />decide, if it can be worked out, to make a monetary payment therefor. <br />If the increment.al cost, which is to say the fuel replacement cost of <br />generating substitute .energy, is less than the selling rate for power from <br />the upper basin projMt, then the upper basin project is better off <br />financially to compensate monetarily than it would be to compensate <br />with kilowatt-hours. On the other hand, it might be simpler and <br />better to compensate witb kilowatt-hours. This could be accomplished <br />through the interconnection of the two power systems. It may even <br />be possible that the Hoover power allottees would be willing to have <br />a system of debits an:d credits on energy. In other words, in those <br />years in which there is a deficiency, the power allot tees might be <br />willing to have that lleficiency replaced in a subsequent year. Par- <br />. ticularly to be noted is the fact that Glen Oanyon Reservoir will be <br />available to store water through two flood seasons prior to the avail- <br />ability of the generators at Glen Oanyon. If any deficiency is created <br />during this period, it can be compensated only by dollars or by debits <br />and credits, unless some other source of energy is available to the <br />United States. Final decisions on (,he means of making the allowanee <br />is not possible at this time and will need to be based upon negotiations <br />and on results of studies now underway in regard to possible eleetrical <br />intertie. <br />In the event of an allowance for computed deficieney, the Hoover <br />power eon tractors will eontinue to pay under the Hoover Dam power <br />contracts in the same manner as if the amount of energy involved in <br />the deficieney had be'en generated at Hoover. <br />Paragraph 6 is simply a tie between the general prineiples and the <br />operating eriteria. <br />Paragraph 7 sets forth the method whereby minimum power head <br />(elevation 3,490) would be gained in Glen Oanyon. The prollosal <br />here is to aequire this storage at the earliest praetieable time. How- <br />ever, Lake Mead would not be drawn below the rated head of the <br />Hoover powerplant while acquiring this storage in ;Glen Oanyon. <br />This is a significant ppint. If the rnted head is maintained at Hoover, <br />then only the energy generation at Hoover is affected and not the <br />design eapacity. . <br />Paragra.ph 8 sets forth the prineiple that the powerplants will be <br />coordinated and integrated and states the general method whereby <br />this will be aceomplished. At this time it is not entirely elear <br />whether the eoordination and integration need be electrieal in addition <br />. to hydrologic. Decisions on possible eleetrieal intertie will need to <br />be made later, following additional study. Only very general plans <br />can be set forth in advanee. To obtain the greatest practieal amount <br />of power and energy,.the plants will have to be operated on an annual <br />basis as conditions QCcur, and there must be therefore freedom to <br />operate without being tied to a specific plan. The proposal for <br />eoordinated and in~egrated operation is deliberately tied to the <br /> <br />