<br />
<br />COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT
<br />
<br />27
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />The Congress, by Pnblic Law 485, 84th Congress, 2d session,
<br />authorized the Co1prado River storage project and participating
<br />projects. In so doing, it excluded the Echo Park unit (consisting of
<br />Echo Park Dam and Split Mountain Dam) and included the Flaming
<br />Gorge, Navajo, and Curecanti units in the initial stage. As a result
<br />of this change and because it was felt that administrative people and
<br />the Congress were entitled to a reappraisal of the project, the Bureau
<br />undertook an economic and financial analysis of the storage project
<br />as it had been auth.orized. This analysis was presented to the Con-
<br />gress and was publi~hed as Senate Document 101, 85th Congress, 2d
<br />session. In order to make such an analysis, it was necessary that
<br />there be assumed certain procedures under which storage would be
<br />accumulated in therreservoirs, For this purpose there was prepared
<br />what has subsequently become known as the "Hydrologic Bases,"
<br />At about this time, there had been indicated widespread interest in
<br />the problem of initial filling of the Glen Canyon reservoir, As a
<br />result, a meeting was held in Washington, D.C., onOctober 24,1957,
<br />The Governors or their representatives and other interested persons
<br />from the seven states of the basin attended that meeting, At that
<br />meeting the statement on "Hydrologic Bases" was presented to the
<br />assembled group, That statement was subsequently revised in cer-
<br />tain aspects and, as revised, became a part of Senate Document 77,
<br />85th Congress, 2d session, Also at that meeting representatives of
<br />Arizona, California, and Nevada offered for consideration the so-
<br />called Tri-State Criteria, These criteria, with a slight modification,
<br />were published as Senate Document 96, 85th Congress, 2d session.
<br />A second meeting was held on December 4, and 5, 1957, in Las
<br />Vegas, Nev, This 'meeting was also atteuded by the Governors or,
<br />in some cases, theirirepresentatives and others from the seven States,
<br />At that meeting the Interior Department offered to meet with any
<br />of the States singly or jointly upon their request, Subsequent to
<br />that meeting there -was established a group of engineers representing
<br />the States of Arizona, California, Nevada, and the Bureau of Recla-
<br />mation, This group was to provide additional information of an
<br />engineering nature aimed specifically at the filling problem, This
<br />engineering group met on the following dates in 1958: February
<br />3 and 4, April 17 and 18; June 25 and 26, September 23 and 24,
<br />and December 8 and 9, The group met on March 4 and 5 in 1959,
<br />and also met with: the upper basin engineers on March 30 and 31
<br />and August 4, 5, and 6, 1959,
<br />During this period the group prepared more than 200 preliminary
<br />studies, some by inanual process and others by electronic digital
<br />computers, These studies were exploratory and, among other things,
<br />provided a general framework for the studies subsequently made,
<br />An additional 65 operational studies have also been made covering
<br />three assumptions 'of runoff sequence for a 36-year period and 8
<br />general sets of filling criteria. A summary, in report form, of the
<br />work of this group' was transmitted to you by letter of August 20,
<br />1959, signed by A. J. Shaver for the lower basin engineering group,
<br />By letter of Au!);ust 27, 1958, the engineering committee of the
<br />Upper Colorado R)ver Commission requested that the Department
<br />appoint a group of engineers to meet with the committee also far
<br />consideration of possible filling criteria, The same Bureau of Recla-
<br />mation engineers: met with the commission's committee, One
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />
|