Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Congress, by Pnblic Law 485, 84th Congress, 2d session, <br />authorized the Co1prado River storage project and participating <br />projects. In so doing, it excluded the Echo Park unit (consisting of <br />Echo Park Dam and Split Mountain Dam) and included the Flaming <br />Gorge, Navajo, and Curecanti units in the initial stage. As a result <br />of this change and because it was felt that administrative people and <br />the Congress were entitled to a reappraisal of the project, the Bureau <br />undertook an economic and financial analysis of the storage project <br />as it had been auth.orized. This analysis was presented to the Con- <br />gress and was publi~hed as Senate Document 101, 85th Congress, 2d <br />session. In order to make such an analysis, it was necessary that <br />there be assumed certain procedures under which storage would be <br />accumulated in therreservoirs, For this purpose there was prepared <br />what has subsequently become known as the "Hydrologic Bases," <br />At about this time, there had been indicated widespread interest in <br />the problem of initial filling of the Glen Canyon reservoir, As a <br />result, a meeting was held in Washington, D.C., onOctober 24,1957, <br />The Governors or their representatives and other interested persons <br />from the seven states of the basin attended that meeting, At that <br />meeting the statement on "Hydrologic Bases" was presented to the <br />assembled group, That statement was subsequently revised in cer- <br />tain aspects and, as revised, became a part of Senate Document 77, <br />85th Congress, 2d session, Also at that meeting representatives of <br />Arizona, California, and Nevada offered for consideration the so- <br />called Tri-State Criteria, These criteria, with a slight modification, <br />were published as Senate Document 96, 85th Congress, 2d session. <br />A second meeting was held on December 4, and 5, 1957, in Las <br />Vegas, Nev, This 'meeting was also atteuded by the Governors or, <br />in some cases, theirirepresentatives and others from the seven States, <br />At that meeting the Interior Department offered to meet with any <br />of the States singly or jointly upon their request, Subsequent to <br />that meeting there -was established a group of engineers representing <br />the States of Arizona, California, Nevada, and the Bureau of Recla- <br />mation, This group was to provide additional information of an <br />engineering nature aimed specifically at the filling problem, This <br />engineering group met on the following dates in 1958: February <br />3 and 4, April 17 and 18; June 25 and 26, September 23 and 24, <br />and December 8 and 9, The group met on March 4 and 5 in 1959, <br />and also met with: the upper basin engineers on March 30 and 31 <br />and August 4, 5, and 6, 1959, <br />During this period the group prepared more than 200 preliminary <br />studies, some by inanual process and others by electronic digital <br />computers, These studies were exploratory and, among other things, <br />provided a general framework for the studies subsequently made, <br />An additional 65 operational studies have also been made covering <br />three assumptions 'of runoff sequence for a 36-year period and 8 <br />general sets of filling criteria. A summary, in report form, of the <br />work of this group' was transmitted to you by letter of August 20, <br />1959, signed by A. J. Shaver for the lower basin engineering group, <br />By letter of Au!);ust 27, 1958, the engineering committee of the <br />Upper Colorado R)ver Commission requested that the Department <br />appoint a group of engineers to meet with the committee also far <br />consideration of possible filling criteria, The same Bureau of Recla- <br />mation engineers: met with the commission's committee, One <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />