Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />, <br />i <br />CO~ORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT <br /> <br />EXPLANATION OF .SHEET 2 OF :3 <br /> <br />Columns (2), (3), (-;1,), and (5): Actual reservoir storage content, Lake Powell, <br />Flaming Gorge, Cure<ianti units, and Navaho. Values for each of these columns <br />are the actual end of month reservoir surface storage content plus an estimate of <br />initial accumulation of bank storage~ <br />Columns (6), (7), (8), and (9): Reservoir storage change-Lake Powell, Flaming <br />Gorge, Curecanti units and Navaho. Values in these columns are derived from <br />figures in columns (2)j (3), (4), and (5). <br />Column (10): Ac.tual.fl;ow of Colorado River at Grand Canyon. Flow of Colo- <br />rado River measured py, and data reported by Geological Survey. <br />Column (11): Thedretical flow of Colorado River at Grand Canyon. This is <br />computed as the sum) of columns (6) through (10). It is the actual flow of the <br />Colorado River at Grand Canyon increased by reservoir storage changes (algebraic) <br />in the Colorado River: storage project reservoirs. <br />Column (12): Computation of theoretical total net loss from Lake Mead, actual <br />total net loss. This Is a water budget computation using the measured flow at <br />Grand Canyon as infl9w to Lake Mead, the actual release from Hoover Dam and <br />the actual measured :storage change in Lake' Mead. It includes unmeasured <br />inflow to the river anq lake below the Grand Canyon gaging station, evaporation., <br />loss from the lake, chatfges in bank storage, and diversions from the lake to Nevada. <br />Column (13): Computation of theoretical total net loss from Lake Mead- <br />adjustment of evaporE\tion loss. This is an adjustment to be applied to the actual <br />total net loss (eo1. 12)1 and is the difference (theoretical minus aotual) between the <br />theoretical evaporatiop for the theoretioal surface area pf the lake which corre- <br />sponds to the elevatiop: shown in column (9) of sheet 3 and the evaporation com- <br />puted by the Geologicl11 Survey for the actual surface area of the lake. The evap- <br />oration rate applied tp the theoretical surface area of the lake is the same rate <br />Bpplied by the Geological Survey to the actual surface area. <br />Column (14): Computation of theoretical total n€'t loss from Lake Mead- <br />theoretical total net loss. Column (12) plus (algebraic) column (13). <br /> <br />, <br />