My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00615
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:55 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:51:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/25/1996
Title
Record of Decision - Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Record of Decision
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />The maximum flow criterion of 25,000 cubic feet per second will be implemented with the <br />understanding that actual maximum daily releases would only occasionally exceed 20,000 cubic <br />feet per second during a minimum release year of 8.23 million acre-feet. This is because the <br />maximum allowable daily change constraint overrides the maximum allowable release and because <br />monthly release volumes are lower during minimum release years. If impacts differing from those <br />described in the final EIS are identified through the Adaptive Management Program, the <br />maximum flow restriction will be reviewed by the Adaptive Management Work Group and a <br />recommendation for action will be forwarded to the Secretary. <br /> <br />m. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />Nine alternative methods of operating Glen Canyon Dam (including the No Action Alternative) <br />were presented in the final EIS. The eight action alternatives were designed to provide a <br />reasonable range of alternatives with respect to operation of the dam. One alternative would <br />allow unrestricted fluctuations in flow (within the physical constraints of the power plant) to <br />maximize power production, four would impose varying restrictions on fluctuations, and three <br />others would provide steady flows on a monthly, seasonal, or annual basis. The names of the <br />alternatives reflect the various operational regimes. In addition, the restricted fluctuating flow and <br />steady flow alternatives each include seven elements which are common to all of them. These <br />common elements are: I) Adaptive Management, 2) Monitoring and Protecting Cultural <br />Resources, 3) Flood Frequency Reduction Measures, 4) Beach/Habitat-Building Flows, 5) New <br />Population of Humpback Chub, 6) Further Study of Selective Withdrawal, and 7) Emergency <br />Exception Criteria. A detailed description of the alternatives and common elements can be found <br />in Chapter 2 of the final EIS. A brief description of the alternatives is given below. <br /> <br />UNRESTRICTED FLUCTUATING FLOWS <br /> <br />No Action: Maintain the historic pattern of fluctuating releases up to 31,500 cubic feet <br />per second and provide a baseline for impact comparison. <br /> <br />Maximum Power plant Capacity: Pennit use of full power plant capacity up to 33,200 <br />cubic feet per second. <br /> <br />RESTRICTED FLUCTUATING FLOWS <br /> <br />High: Slightly reduce daily fluctuations from historic levels. <br /> <br />Moderate: Moderately reduce daily fluctuations from historic levels; includes habitat <br />maintenance flows. <br /> <br />Modified Low (preferred Alternative): Substantially reduce daily fluctuations from <br />historic levels; includes habitat maintenance flows. <br /> <br />Interim Low: Substantially reduce daily fluctuations from historic levels; same as interim <br />operations except for addition of COmmon elements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.