My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00615
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:55 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:51:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/25/1996
Title
Record of Decision - Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Record of Decision
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,. <br /> <br />CITY OF ENfERPRISE <br /> <br />P.O. Box 340 <br />ENTERPRISE, UTAH 84725 <br />(801) 878-2221 <br />FAX (801) 878-2223 <br /> <br />1'-7.~:~"i:~. .;:;,....::~:".-<C <br />. ,.......-,....-, -. 'i 81,...U <br />f -':':-Fi'~Ar~.;.- F ~~~ ~_~!::py <br />; <br /> <br />MR. RICK GOLD <br />COLORADO RIVER STUDIES OFFICE <br />BUREAU OF RECLAMATION <br />ATTN: UC1512 <br />BOX 11568 <br />SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84147 <br /> <br />DEAR MR. GOLD: <br /> <br />FOI ,-/,-/':; <br /> <br />APR 2 5 1995 <br />'cfJ.V:1~.'Y'! - <br />'-c<- -' <br />'-' - <br />_ .. ..:....~ .. "ow <br />.: .-X;~~~_~-~_~~! <br /> <br />APRIL 12, 1995 <br /> <br />.'0- '. ... <br /> <br />L F[.I 51 <br /> <br />/. ",.~ . <br />. ...1:...._.; <br /> <br />. ","r- <br /> <br />.~..~..'-'--i <br />. '~.'-f <br />..,..t~.':".~....~ <br /> <br />THE FINAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS), WHICH WAS RELEASED ON MARCH <br />22, 1995, REFLECTS YEARS OF RESEARCH, STUDY AND DISCUSSION AMONG <br />DIVERSE GROUPS. POWER USERS HAVE BORNE SOME $100 MILLION IN STUDY <br />COSTS TO ASCERTAIN THE EFFECT OF POWER OPERATIONS ON THE <br />ENVIRONMENT IN THE GRAND CANYON. WE PLEDGED AT THE OUTSET TO ACCEPT <br />THE FINAL RECOMMENDATION, PROVIDED THAT IT COULD BE SUPPORTED BY <br />CREDIBLE, THOROUGH SCIENCE. <br /> <br />NOW THAT THE FEIS IS OUT, SOME GROUPS ARE CHALLENGING THE <br />RECOMMENDATION. IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE THAT NO PARTICULAR GROUP IS <br />FULLY SATISFIED WITH THE RESULT, INCLUDING POWER USERS. THE FEIS IS <br />TRULY A COMPROMISE, A RECOGNITION THAT THE BENEFITS OF THIS PUBLIC <br />RESOURCE MUST BE SHARED AMONG MANY--AND SOMETIME COMPETING-- <br />INTERESTS. FOR US, IT MEANS THE LOSS OF VALUABLE PEAKING CAPACITY <br />FROM GLEN CANYON, WHICH WE MUST REPLACE AT HIGHER COST. <br /> <br />SCIENCE SUPPORTS THE RECOMMENDED WATER RELEASE PATTERNS <br />CONTAINED IN THE FEIS. ACCORDING TO INFORMATION RELEASED BY THE <br />BUREAU, "the GeES senior scientist and the advisory <br />group....determined there would be no significant impact to <br />downstream resources if the maximum flow was raised to 25,000 cfs <br />and the upramp to 4,000 cfs per hour." <br /> <br />I COMMEND THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AND THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE <br />COOPERATING AGENCIES FOR THEIR DEDICATION TO SOUND SCIENTIFIC <br />METHODS AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE FINDINGS. THE GeEIS IS A <br />MODEL FOR RESOLVING COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AMONG DIVERGENT <br />INTERESTS. I URGE YOU TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROCESS AND <br />RESIST EFFORTS TO OVERTURN THE FEIS. ALLOW THE SCIENTISTS' <br />ASSESSMENT TO STAND, KNOWING THAT THE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROCESS <br />WILL GIVE THE BUREAU AN OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF <br />OPERATIONAL CHANGES OVER TIME AND MAKE IFICATIONS ACCORDING TO <br />SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.