Laserfiche WebLink
<br />N <br />t' <br />CJl <br />1-. <br /> <br />There were statistically significant downward <br />trends during water years 1986-93 in the Colorado <br />River near the State Iille (station 09163500) for flow- <br />adjusted dissolved-solids, magnesium, sodium, and <br />sulfate concentrations' and flow-adjusted monthly <br />and annual dissolved-solids loads. The cumulative <br />effects of salinity-control projects in the Grand Valley <br />and the lower GunnisC?n River Basin on dissolved <br />solids in the Colorado:River would have become more <br />pronounced after the Jilid-1980's, The decreasing <br />constituent concentrations and dissolved-solids <br />loads at station 09163500 for 1986-93 also were <br />reported for the Colorado River near Cameo <br />(station 09095500), wl1ich is upstream from the <br />salinity-control projects. Some of the decreases in, <br />dissolved solids at station 09163500 may have resulted <br />from decreases in dissolved solids in the Colorado <br />River at station 09095$00. Apparently, there are natu- <br />ral or man-induced effepts in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin that may be rela~ed to the trends of decreasing <br />salinity in the Colorado River near Cameo. Compari- <br />son of trend slopes for annual dissolved-solids loads <br />indicated that some of (he decrease in dissolved-solids <br />loads in the Colorado River near the State line since <br />1986 probably were related to salinity-control projects <br />in the Grand Valley and in the lower Gunnison River <br />Basin. <br /> <br />Step-trend tests on chloride and sodium data col- <br />lected at three gaging stations on the White River in the <br />vicinity of Meeker Dome were used to verify that plug- <br />ging of three wells on Meeker Dome in 1980---81 was <br />effective in decreasing the discharge of saline ground <br />water from the leaking wells and to verify that the well <br />plugging had remained intact through early 1995. <br />Multiple t-tests were done on concentrations and on <br />ranks of the concentrations to compare chloride and <br />sodium data collected before and after the well plug- <br />ging. Also, flow-adjusted chloride and sodium concen- <br />trations were tested using ESTREND. Chloride and <br />sodium concentrations have remained relatively <br />unchanged from water years 1973 to 1995 in the White <br />River above Coal Creek. which is upstream from <br />Meeker Dome. At two ~tations downstream from <br />Meeker Dome, White River at Meeker and White River <br />below Meeker, chloride llnd sodium concentrations had <br />highly significant (signi6cance level less than 0.01) <br />decreases after the well plugging was completed. <br />Chloride and sodium cOllcentrations have not changed <br />significantly since April 1982 in the White River <br />downstream from Meeker Dome, indicating that the <br />well plugging has remained intact. <br /> <br />REFERENCES CITED <br /> <br />Bureau of Rec1amation, 1982, Lower Gunnison Basin Unit, <br />feasibility report-Appendix B, Hydrosalinity: Salt <br />Lake City, Utah, Upper Colorado Region, 86 p. <br />-1983, Grand Valley salt pickup calculations, Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Project: Grand Junction, <br />Colo. [three sections plus appendixes]. <br />-1984, Lower Gunnison Basin Unit, feasibility <br />report/final environmental statement: Salt Lake City, <br />Utah, Upper Colorado Region, 204 p. <br />-1985a, Grand Valley Unit, Stage 1\vo development, <br />final environmental impact statement: Bureau of <br />Reclamation Report INT FES86-1 0, 217 p. <br />-1985b, Planning report, concluding the study on <br />Meeker Dome Unit, Colorado: Salt Lake City, Utah, <br />Upper Colorado Region, 35 p. <br />-1986, Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, <br />Grand Valley Unit-Stage 1\vo development, water <br />resources technical supporting data for the verification <br />memorandum, April 1986: Salt Lake City, Utah, <br />Upper Colorado Region [8 chapters]. <br />-1987, Lower Gunnison Basin Unit-Winter water: <br />Salt Lake City, Utah, Colorado River Water Quality <br />Improvement Program Preconstruction Report. 57 p. <br />-1994, Lower Gunnison Basin Unit-East side later- <br />als: Salt Lake City, Utah, Colorado River Water <br />Quality Improvement Program, 51 p. [supplement to <br />the feasihility report]. <br />Butler, D.L., Wright, W.G., Hahn, D.G., Krueger, RP., <br />and Osmundson, B.C., 1994, Physical, chemical, <br />and biological data for the detailed study of irrigation <br />drainage in the Uncompahgre Project area and in <br />the Grand Valley, west-central Colorado, 1991-92: <br />U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-110, <br />146p. <br />CH2M Hill, 1979, Problem identification and quantification, <br />Meeker Dome salinity investigation: Denver, Colo. <br />[four numbered sections plus appendixes]. <br />-1982, Phase I report, salinity investigation of the <br />Meeker Dome Unit: Denver, Colo. [nine numbered <br />sections]. <br />Cleveland, W.S., 1979, Robust locally weighted regression <br />and smoothing scatterplots: Journal of American <br />Statistical Association, v. 74, no. 368, p. 829-836. <br />Hedlund, J.D., 1994, Water and salt budgets: Portland, Ore., <br />U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation <br />Service, West National Technical Center, 60 p. <br />Helsel, D.R., and Hirsch, R.M., 1992, Statistical methods <br />in water resources; Amsterdam, Elsevier Science <br />Publishers, 529 p. <br />Hirsch, RM., Alexander, RB., and Smith, RA., 1991, <br />Selection of methods for the detection and estimation <br />of trends in water quality: Water Resources Research, <br />v. 27, no. 5, p. 803-813. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />REFERENCES CITED 37 <br />