My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00601
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:51 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:50:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USGS
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1996
Author
USGS
Title
Trend Analysis of Selected Water-Quality Data Associated with Salinity-Control Projects in the Grand Valley - in the Lower gunnison River Basin - and at Meeker Dome Western Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table 3. Monotonic trends in monthly dissolved-solids loads for gaging stations 09095500 Colorado River near Cameo, <br />09152500 Gunnison River near Grand Junction, and 09163500 Colorado River near the Colorado-Utah State line, water <br />years 1970-93 <br /> <br /> [Periods are ,in water years; slopes are in tons per month per year; percent is the slope expressed as percent change per year; p value is the significance level <br /> of the test; SL, significance levels, which are: HS is highly significant, p is less than or equal to 0.01; S is significant, p is greater than 0,01 and less <br />N than or equal to 0.05; MS is marginally significant, p is greater than 0.05 and less than Of equal to 0.10; and NS is not significant, p is greater than 0.10; <br />1'.' <, less than] <br />tv UnadJuated monthly load <br />N Station Period Flow-adjusted monthly load <br /> Slope Percent p value SL Slope Percent p value SL <br /> 09095500 1970-93 -686 -{).56 <0.001 HS 333 -{).27 <0.001 HS <br /> 1980-93 -1,280 -1.03 <.001 HS -687 -.55 .001 HS <br /> 1986-93 -5,440 -4.69 <.001 HS -3,840 -3.31 <.001 HS <br /> 09152500 1970-93 -660 -.63 .002 HS -451 -.43 <.001 HS <br /> 1980-93 -866 -.83 .074 MS 317 .30 .201 NS <br /> 1986-93 -2.210 -2.26 .125 NS 332 .34 .592 NS <br /> 09163500 1970-93 -2,180 -.80 <.001 HS -1,680 -.61 <.001 HS <br /> 1980-93 -2,930 -1.06 .001 HS -1,080 -.39 .009 HS <br /> 1986-93 -12,100 -4.72 <.001 HS -4,480 -1.74 <.001 HS <br /> <br />Annual Dissolved-Solids Loads <br /> <br />None of the trends in the unadjusted annual <br />dissolved-solids loads were significant (table 4). <br />The flow-adjusted annual loads for the Gunnison <br />River at station 09152500 and for the Colorado <br />River at station 09163500 had significant or highly <br />significant downward trends for water years 1970--93. <br />The LOWESS smooth curve in figure 8 indicates <br />that the flow-adjusted annual loads decreased at <br />station 09163500 during the 1970's and again after <br />1986. The trend slope of -62,300 tons/yr for 1986-93 <br />for station 09163500 was highly significant (table 4). <br />The flow"adjusted annual loads for 1986-93 at <br />station 09095500 also were decreasing, and the trend <br />was highly significant. The LOWESS smooth curve <br />for station 09152500 (fig. 8) indicates that most of the <br />trend in flow-adjusted annual loads for 1970--93 in the <br />Gunnison River occurred before 1980. The trends in <br />flow-adjusted annual loads for 1980--93 and 1986-93 <br />(table 4) for station 09152500 were not significant. <br /> <br />There were fewer significant trends in annual <br />dissolved-solids loads than in monthly dissolved-solids <br />loads. One problem with using annual data is that the <br />sample sizes are decreased compared to data sets com- <br />posed of monthly data. The p value for hypothesis test- <br />ing is affected by sample size. For a given magnitude <br /> <br />(trend magnitude for trend tests) and variance, p values <br />tend to increase as the sample size decreases (Helsel <br />and Hirsch, 1992); therefore, it becomes more difficult <br />to reject the null hypothesis (of no trend) as sample size <br />becomes smaller. Although the trend tests on the flow- <br />adjusted annual loads for water years 1986-93 are <br />based on only eight values, the magnitude of the slopes <br />for the two Colorado River stations (09095500 and <br />09163500 in table 4) were sufficiently large to have <br />highly significant p values. <br /> <br />Seasonal Dissolved-Solids Loads <br /> <br />Seasonal dissolved-solids loads represent the <br />total load for selected periods, or seasons, within a <br />year. Seasonal loads were computed by summing the <br />monthly loads of the individual months in a season and <br />then were treated as annual values for performing trend. <br />tests using linear-regression analysis. The trend results <br />would reflect only the trend slopes and p values for <br />loads for a particular season and would be independent <br />from the remainder of the year. Flow-adjusted trends <br />were determined by using the average daily stream- <br />flows for each seasonal period of each year in the flow- <br />adjustment models. Trends were analyzed for two sea- <br />sonal periods; August through October (late irrigation- <br />season effects) and November through February (low- <br />flow effects). <br /> <br />18 Trend 'Analysla 01 Selected Water-Quality Data Asaoclated With Sallnlty-Control Prolecta In the Grand Valley, <br />In the 'Lower Gunnison River Basin, and at Meeker Dome, Western Colorado <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.