Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />~ c) <br />:In <br />/-. <br />;, <br />~ <br />;) <br /> <br />-- <br />.. <br /> <br />~ <br />::i <br />;l <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />..; <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />.,;J <br />~, <br />~ <br />~ <br />:~. <br />;; <br />;, <br /> <br />-. <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />.- <br />~ <br />..;1 <br />;) <br />~ <br />':l <br />~ <br />':l <br />~ <br />~ <br />;;. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />'.;l <br />:Ol <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />summer rainstorm events that result in repeated scouring of the substrate and heavy sediment <br />load carried by short-duration flood events. <br /> <br />Mechanical removal of channel catfish, as a potential control measure, was implemented and <br />evaluated during 1995. Passive (hoop and trammel netting) and active (electrofishing) methods <br />were employed, with the latter more effective in capturing channel catfish. Removal efforts <br />employing passive and active methods in discrete reaches (3 river miles) separated by control <br />reaches were unsuccessful due to failure of passive methods to collect adequate numbers of fish <br />and was discontinued after one sampling season. During 1,967 hours of hoop netting only 25 <br />channel catfish and II common carp were removed. River-wide removal of all non-native <br />species during spring and fall main channel monitoring surveys, 1995-1997, yielded 22,985 fish. <br />Channel catfish (n=12,660; 5,139 kg) and common carp (n=10,016; 12,433 kg) comprised the <br />majority of fish removed. Analyses of the electrofishing catch per unit effort, mean total length, <br />and biomass of channel catfish in a sub-reach of Reach 6 (PNM Weir to the Hogback Diversion) <br />yielded lower abundance estimates from 1996 to 1997 and may be a response to removal efforts. <br />Transplantation of channel catfish from the San Juan River to isolated recreational angling <br />impoundments is proposed as a means of disposing of non-native channel catfish to minimize <br />interactions with native fishes and increase the quality (size offish stocked) of current hatchery- <br />supported sport fisheries. <br /> <br />It was hypothesized at the beginning of the SJRlP that mimicry of the natural hydro graph through <br />Navajo Dam releases would benefit native fishes and act to minimize non-native species <br />interactions. Data collected during this study did not identifY negative responses of the non- <br />native fish community (channel catfish and common carp) to mimicry of the natural hydrograph <br />(high spring flows timed to coincide with peak Animas River flows). Long-term removal <br />measures to control large-bodied non-native fishes such as channel catfish, however, may <br />successfully reduce abundance and distribution and allow for improved conditions and survival <br />of the native fishes in the San Juan River. <br /> <br />San Juan River Non-native Species Interactions, Final Report, 1 February 2000 <br /> <br />IV <br />