Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Actual Operations Under Criteria - Water Year 1986 <br /> <br />The initial plan of operation for water year ending September <br />30, 1986, based on forecasted inflow conditions for October <br />through January and average inflow conditions through the <br />rest of the water year 1986 called for scheduled releases from <br />Lake Powell of 11.5 million acre-feet (MAP). This plan of <br />operation would have created 6.7 MAF of vacant space in the <br />Colorado River reservoir system by the end of September <br />1986, of which 1.8 MAFwould have been in Lake Powell. With <br />this plan of operation Ihe conlents of Lakes Powell and Mead <br />would have been within 3,000 acre-feet of each other at the <br />end of September 1986. <br /> <br />The April through July forecast of runoff made on January 1, <br />1986, was 10.6 MAF or 130 percent of the long term average. <br />This long term average is, calculated by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation using 80 years of natural flow data (1906;1985) <br />and current depletion levels. Accordingly, releases from Glen <br />Canyon power plant were maintained at 20,000 cubic feel per <br />second (cfs) January and February. The April-July forecast <br />increased slightly in March, up to 135 percent of average. In <br />response to this higher forecast, powerplant releases <br />increased to 90 percent of capacity during March and April. <br />A cold, wet April provided an increase to the snowpack, so by <br />the first of May the runoff forecast had increased up to 12.6 <br />MAF or 154 percent of the long term average. As a result, the <br />releases from Glen Canyon were increased to 100 percent of <br />capacity for both the powerplant and river outlet works. <br />Reservoir inflows remained above average during May, and <br />in conjunction with a wet weatner pattern, caused an early <br />melt of lower elevation snow. This caused the inflow to Lake <br />Powell to rise to 61,400 cfs in early May. <br /> <br />With warmer temperatures, a snowmelt runoff peak of <br />110,400 cfs unregulated flow was observed on June 9, 1986. <br />Unregulated runoff is the inflow to Lake Powell adjusted for <br /> <br />the change in storage of the upstream resen'oirs discussed in <br />this report. Corresponding with the passing of the peak inflow, <br />the river outlet works at Glen Canyon were closed while thc <br />powerplant remained at maximum releases through the end <br />of the month. The actual uoregulated April-July runoff into <br />Lake Powell was 12.5 MAP in 1986, or 153 percent of average, <br />and Lake Powell reached its maximum elevation of 3,700.02 <br />feet on July 27. <br /> <br />The total unregulated runoff for water year 1986 at Lake <br />Powell was 18.2 MAF or 152 percent of the long-term average. <br />Water supply for the San Juan River above Navajo Dam and <br />the mainstem Colorado River above Grand Junction, <br />Colorado, for the water year were at 169 percent, while the <br />Gll1l11ison River above Blue Mesa Oam was at 131 percent, <br />and the Green River above Flaming Gorge Oam was at 184 <br />percent of average. Total releases from Glen Canyon were <br />16.7 MAP, while the regulated inflow for the year was 17.8 <br />MAF. Aggregate Colorado River storage at the end of the <br />year was 55.7 MAF, representing an increase of 100,000 <br />acre-feet from the previous year. <br /> <br />Commencing in 1986 the operation of the Colorado River <br />Reservoir System was coordinated with Federal and Slate <br />interests through the Colorado River Management Task <br />Force. The task force is comprised of representatives from <br />each of the seven Basin States, the Upper Colorado River <br />Commission, International Boundary and Water <br />Commission, Western Area Power Administration, and the <br />, Bureau of Reclamation, and was implemented by Secretary of <br />the Interior Oonald P. Hodel. It represents a comprehensive <br />effort by the seven Colorado River BasinStates and numerous <br />Federal agencies and serves as a technical forum for re,solving <br />operational issues on the Colorado River. <br /> <br />2 <br />