My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00557
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00557
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:33 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:49:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8126.700
Description
Arkansas River Coordinating Committee - Committees - Subcommittees
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
11/1/1993
Author
CWPDA
Title
Colorado Water Protective and Development Association
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'--'~~"~,:"'~~~ <br />;.---' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A-~~ <br />1","~....t \O............,.V..;T <br />~I{n ' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Colorado Water Protective and Development Association <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Protective and Development Association <br />("CWPDA") is a non-profit Colorado corporation incorporated since <br />1965. <br /> <br />CWPDA was founded in 1964 by Arkansas <br />protect members against legislation that could <br />well diversions. Its stated primary purpose <br />develop the underground and surface waters of <br />upstream of John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />Valley farmers to <br />curtail irrigation <br />is to protect and <br />the Arkansas River <br /> <br />CWPDA's 315 members, representing 800 wells, are persons, <br />corporations, groups, bodies politic, or other entities that own or <br />control wells within the Arkansas River Basin upstream of John <br />Martin Reservoir. It is believed that slightly less than half of <br />all well owners within the area of Southeastern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District are members of CWPDA. <br /> <br />Since its inception, a primary focus of CWPDA has been to <br />obtain augmentation water to cover depletions from member wells. <br />Although the State Engineer's Rules and Regulations ,governing use <br />of groundwater in the Arkansas River Basin curtail well diversions <br />for four out seven days, CWPDA members are allowed to pump seven <br />days a week because of the augmentation water purchased by CWPDA, <br /> <br />In the past, CWPDA has purchased water from various sources, <br />including return flows from the Southeastern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District, as augmentation water for its members. The <br />augmentation water is paid for through yearly membership fees and <br />assessments. CWPDA has had relatively good success working with <br />the Division and State Engineer's to protect its members, and its <br />augmentation program has been condoned by the State of Colorado. <br /> <br />It is believed that a great majority of members of CWPDA use <br />their wells as a supplemental source - supplemental to surface <br />water supplies from ditches and reservoirs. All members of CWPDA <br />are presently required to have wells adjudicated in 1972 or prior <br />years, and l1lany have priority dates which precede the Arkansas <br />River Compact and/or the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. <br /> <br />CWPDA has been active in monitoring the Kansas v. Colorado <br />lawsuit and has assisted the State of Colorado by providing vital <br />information concerning member wells and diversions. CWPDA has been <br />careful to anticipate possible outcomes of that litigation. <br />consequently, in 1992 CWPDA began an extensive survey and testing <br />program of its members' wells to determine the amount pumped from <br />each well. This information will prove useful in evaluating the <br />efficiency of those wells, use and diversions, as well as <br />augmentation requirements. The testing will continue in 1993. In <br />addition, CWPDA has recently engaged Jeris Danielson as a <br />consul tant. A copy of Mr. Danielson I s report to the Division <br />Engineer is attached and outlines some results from the testing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.