My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00556
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00556
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:33 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:49:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.17
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/2001
Author
Rubin et al.
Title
What Regulates Suspended-Sediment Transport in a Given Setting? Grain Size of Bed Sediment or Flow?
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sed,mentation Conferenct!, March 25 to 29. 2001. Reno. Nevada <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />EXAMPLES <br /> <br />Calculation of a An example of grain-size regulation of sediment transport occurred during an experimental flood <br />on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon in 1996 (Rubin et aI., 1998; Topping et aI., 1999), For the seven days of the <br />flood experiment, clear water was released from Glen Canyon Dam at the rate of 1270 rJ/s, In response to this <br />erosive flow, the bed at the Grand Canyon gage coarsened, which caused suspended sediment to both coarsen and <br />decrease in concentration. The resulting negative correlation between suspended-sediment concentration and grain <br />size (Fig. 2a) demonstrates that grain-size regulation was important during this event. Calculated values ofa for <br />data co\Iected at 3 reaches during the flood were .1.5, ,3.3, and .6.3, indicating that changes in sediment transport <br />were regulated primarily by changes in bed-sediment grain size (10.) > I). <br /> <br />Calculation of B The same observations of suspended~sediment concentration used to calculate a can be used to <br />calculate changes in the relative coarseness of sediment on the bed during the flood (Fig. 2b). Comparison with <br />sampled bed sediment not only shows good agreement, but the smoother trend of the calculated values suggests that <br />the calculalions may be more representative of the system than measurements at a single cross-section. In this case, <br />where river discharge was constant, changes in ~ reflect actual changes in grain size of sediment on the bed. In other <br />situations, where discharge is free to vary, calculated changes in P can reflect changes in grain size on the bed, as <br />well as changes in the region of the bed that is accessible to the flow, The predicted values of bed ,sedi men I diameter <br />are in close agreement with observed values. The predicted values have less scatter than the values observed at a <br />single cross-section and may be more representa tive of the river. <br /> <br />APPLICATIONS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The technique developed by Rubin and Topplng (in press) and summarized in this paper has important applications <br />with respect to: (I) designing sediment-transport measurement programs, (2) constructing sediment-transport <br />models, (3) providing a starting point for the accurate determination ofTMDLs for sediment, and (4) determining <br />whether changes in upstream sediment budgels are positive or negative. First, this technique allows one to best <br />design a sediment-transport measurement program. If, in a given situation, the dominant regulator of sediment <br />transport is the flow, then an approximately stable relationship exists between the discharge of water and sediment <br />transport (i.e., a stable sediment rating curve exists). In this case. measurements can be collected so that they best <br />define a sediment rating curve (i.e., they are uniformly distributed across the entire range of flows). In contrast, if <br />the dominant regulator of sediment transport is the grain size of the bed sediment, then sediment transport is <br />controlled by changes in the upstream sediment supply and no stable sediment rating curve exists; measurements <br />need 10 be closely spaced in time. In a similar manner, this technique provides a guide to knowing the pertinent <br />physical processes to include in a sediment transport model. If the dominant regulator of sediment transport is the <br />flow, then a model can be constructed that predicts a stable sediment rating curve by assuming that the channel <br />geometry and bed sediment are in equilibrium with the flow. However, if the dominant regulator of sediment <br />transport is the grain size of the bed sediment. then a totally different type of mooel needs to be constructed. one that <br />routes sediment downstream from its source. A third application of this technique involves the Calculation of <br />TMDLs for sediment In the case where Ihe now is the dominanl regulator of sediment transport, TMDLs can be <br />easily calculated using stable sediment rating curves (either measured or modeled). However, in the case where bed <br />sediment grain size is Ihe dominanl regulator of sediment Iransport, TMDLs Call only be calculated by detennining <br />the maximum naturally occurring daily supply of sediment. Finally, Ihis lechnique allows upstream sediment budgets <br />to be inlerpreted based on data from only one site. By determining whether P is increasing or decreasing over long <br />time scales, one can detcnnine whether the upstream supply of fine sediment is decreasing or increasing over long <br />time scales. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1-203 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.