Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002496 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />TABLE 1 <br />CANAL LOSS DATA <br /> <br /> Length Canal Loss Coefficients 1) Lateral Loss2) <br />Ditch (Mil a b Coefficient <br />Amity 82 .0074 .832 7,5 <br />Kicking Bird 38 .OOSO .816 na <br />Buffalo 38 .0011 .607 3.5 <br />Fort Bent 25 .0080 1.000 2.3 <br />Hyde 5 .0084 .953 0.5 <br />Keesee 7 .0063 .944 0.6 <br />Lamar 20 .0057 .893 1.8 <br />Manvel 9 .0225 .984 0.8 <br />>0( & Graham 18 .0088 .974 1.6 <br />Sisson-Stubbs 6 .0344 .930 0.5 <br />Catlin 39 .0071 .872 3.5 <br />Las Animas 21 .0205 .838 1.9 <br />Fort Lyon 110 .0067 .847 10.0 <br />Fort Lyon Storage 48 .0035 .973 na <br />Holbrook 54 .0075 .795 4.9 <br />Otero 55 .0048 .960 5.0 <br />Rocky Ford 14 .0253 .792 1.3 <br />Bessemer (before Pueblo) 35 .COSS .819 3.2 <br />Bessemer (after Pueblo) 35 .0310 .755 3.2 <br />Colorado 48 .D15S .632 4.4 <br />Excelsior 8 .0194 .982 0.7 <br />Oxford Farmers 13 .0151 .923 1.2 <br />Highline 80 .0043 .854 7.3 <br />Mlnnequa & Union 46 3) 3) 4.2 <br />1) For the equation q = a ab. <br />2) Percent of headgate diversion less canal k: s" ~ ') <br />3) Unavailable pending Water District 12 cflVe'Sb:'1 records. <br /> <br />~ <br />