My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00547
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:30 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:49:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
12/1/1992
Author
Resource Consultants
Title
Mineral Bottom Geomorphic Investigation Trip Report - December 1992
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />on033 <br /> <br />banks. Mass failure of the banks also causes removal of the bank vegetation in what appears to be a <br />self-regulating feedback mechanism. Since the undercutting of the banks (the mechanism that steepens <br />the bank angle) occurs during relatively low flows, it can be argued that the increased duration of mid <br />range flows following dam emplacement on the Green River (Andrews, 1986) has increased the rate at <br />which the tamarisk is being removed. <br /> <br />2) Channel Capacity <br /> <br />Determination of the frequency of overbank flooding along the study reach of the Green River <br />Is dependent on being able to define the channel capacity. To achieve this, a number of cross sections <br />were surveyed during the field inspection. At Cottonwood Bottom, the USFWS had established an IFIM <br />site in 1980 with the additional purpose of having a channel monitoring site to Investigate <br />aggradation/degradation trends in this reach of the river. Six cross sections were surveyed, tied together <br />horizontally and vertically and monumented. between RM 55 and RM 56. The cross sections w,ere <br />surveyed at discharges of 10,000. 5.100 and 2,600 cfs. The plotted cross sections (provided by Mr. <br />George Smith. USFWS) clearly indicate that cross section geometry Is dependent on discharge (Harvey <br />and Watson. 1989; Anthony and Harvey. 1992) and that aggradation/degradation trends should be <br />based only on resurveys conducted at similar discharges. Cross sections (transects) 2. 3. 4, and 6 were <br />relocated and resurveyed on 14 May. 1992 at a discharge of about 9.500 cfs. The plotted cross sections <br />are attached to this report (Appendix A). Also shown on the plotted cross sections are the profiles for <br />the 10.000 cfs survey in .1980. Comparisons of the profiles indicates that there has been very little <br />change at any of the cross sections other than what Is to be expected given the minor differences In <br />discharge between the 2 surveys. <br /> <br />Cross sections were also surveyed at 81ocatioris at Unknown Bottom between RM 28.5 and RM <br />31.3. The subaqueous portions of the cross sectlons were recorded on a fathometer trace and later <br />digitized. Observations of the bank heights and Inclinations were made as well and the surveyed bank <br />profiles for the Cottonwood Bottom cross sections were transferred to the appropriate cross sections <br />(on the basis of locaticn within the bend) at the downstream location. Cross section stationing, and <br />hence the. horizontal relationship between the sections was approximated, from the topographiC map. <br />(The channel slope was also approximated from the topographic ,maps at the Unknown Bottom <br />location.) The plotted cross sections are attached to this report (Appendix B). <br /> <br />The surveyed cross sections at the two locations were used to create HEG-2 models for each <br />of the reaches. At the Cottonwood Bottom reach. the bankfull discharge for the individual cross <br />sections ranged from 34,000 to 22,000 cfs for a Manning's n value of 0.03 and from 29,000 to 19.300 <br />cfs for an n value of 0,035. Average values for the reach were 32.980 and 28.167 cfs for n values <br />of 0.03 and 0.035. respectively. At the Unknown Bottom reach the bankfull discharge for the individual <br />cross sections ranged from 41,900 to 34,000 cfs for an n value of 0.03. and 41.900 to 30,200 cfs for <br />an n value of 0.035. Average values for the reach were 36,240 and 32.560 cfs for n values of 0.03 <br />and 0.035, respectively. <br /> <br />To determine the frequency of inundation of the bottomlands. a flow duration curve was <br />developed from mean dally flows for the Green River at the Green River. Utah gaging station for the <br />period 1963 to 1990 (Figure 1). Also shown on the figure Is the flow duration curve for the period <br />between 1963 and 1982 developed by Andrews (1986). Comparison of the curves demonstrates the <br />effects of the high discharge years of 1983. 1984 and 1986 on the upper end of the flow duration curves. <br />At the Cottonwood Bottom reach. the exceedence frequencies for the reach averaged bankfull <br />discharges are 1.3 percent and 0.8 percent for n values of 0.03 and 0.035, respectively. The <br />exceedence frequencies translate into 4.7 and 2.9 days per year. At the Unknown Bottom reach the <br />exceedence frequencies for the reach average bankfull discharges are 0.4 percent and 0.3 percent for <br />n values of 0.03 and 0.035, respectively. The exceedence frequencies translate into 1.5 and 1.1 days <br />per year. The exceedence frequencies represent average values and they do not indicate that bankfull <br />discharge is exceeded every year. In fact. as the next paragraph shows. bankfull discharge at the 2 <br />sites has a return period of between 4 and 10 years. <br /> <br />3 Resource Consultants & Engineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.