My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00531
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:26 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:49:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
8/1/1987
Author
BLM
Title
Gunnison Basin and the American Flats-Silverton Wilderness - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ ""'; ~ s <br /> <br />only disturb 20 to 40 acres they could <br />impact wilderness values on approximately <br />2,000 acres in these drainages. Wilderness <br />values would be lost on at least 9,000 of <br />the 29,435 acres recommended nonsuitable if <br />a large scale alunite mine and two other <br />small scale mines are developed. In the <br />long term it is expected that wil derness <br />values would be lost on the entire 29,435 <br />acres recommended nonsuitable. <br /> <br />Except as noted above mi neral expl ora ti on <br />and development would be precluded on the <br />11,140 acres recommended suHable. The <br />high potential for discovery in this <br />porti on of the WSA woul d be foregone, The <br />29,435 nonsu1table acres would remain open <br />to entry. <br /> <br />The recreation setting would continue to be <br />a primiti ve backccuntry type except in the <br />vicinity of the alunite mine where it would <br />be changed to one dominated by the sights <br />and sounds of mi ni ng actl vi ty, Use woul d <br />fncrease by 9 percent annually in the <br />suitable portion and remain low in the <br />nonsuitable area. <br /> <br />Alunite development would disturb so11s on <br />520 acres, impact water quality and <br />displace 50 to 80 deer and 100 to 130 elk. <br /> <br />Handles Peak (CO-030-291) <br /> <br />Proposed Action <br />Alternative) <br /> <br />Reso 1 utf on <br /> <br />(Conflict <br /> <br />Under this alternative 7,885 acres would be <br />recommended as suitable and 10,975 acres <br />would be recommended as nonsu;table. <br /> <br />Wilderness designation would provide <br />protection to wilderness values on 7.885 <br />acres with the exception of about 1,000 <br />acres that coul d be affected if projected <br />m;nera' act; vity takes pl ace in the <br />American Basin area. Wilderness values <br />coul d be lost On 400 of the 10, 975 acres <br />recommended nonsuitable as a result of <br />minera 1 development on pr; va te property <br />near Campbell Creek. An additional 10 to <br /> <br />20 acres would be lost to mineral <br />exploration. However, in the long term it <br />is expected that wil derness val ues woul d <br />eventually be lost on the entire 10,975 <br />acres recommended nonsuitable. <br /> <br />The 7,885 acres recommended suitabl e woul d <br />be withdrawn from entry. although three <br />mines are projected to be developed for <br />production of base and precious metals <br />based on val id existing rights. With the <br />exception of these valid rights, the high <br />potential of this portion of the W5A would <br />be foregone. One small scale mine is <br />projected to be developed within the <br />nonsuitable area. <br /> <br />The 7,885 acres recommended as suitable <br />woul d conti nue to provi de a primi the <br />backccuntry recreation setting although <br />mineral development could change some of <br />that within American Basin to one <br />influenced by the sights and sounds on <br />mining activity. The area around Campbell <br />Creek would also change to a setting <br />i nfl uenced by mi ni n9 activity. The current <br />use in the suitable area. estimated to be <br />3000 RUDs woul d increase by about 9 percent <br />annually. <br /> <br />Soil would be disturbed and productivity <br />lost on up to 135 acres, water quality <br />would be adversely affected and bighorn <br />sheep popul ations woul d be affected by <br />mineral exploration within the nonsuitable <br />area. <br /> <br />All Wilderness Alternative <br /> <br />The entire 18,860 acres would be <br />recommended as suitable for wilderness <br />designation with this al ternative. <br />Designation would provide protection to <br />18,860 acres. Although potential <br />development of valid rights in the American <br />8asin area and near Campbell Creek could <br />result in loss of wilderness values on <br />1,400 acres. <br /> <br />The enti re 18,860 acres woul d be withdrawn <br />from mineral entry. Valid rights would <br /> <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.