My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00531
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:26 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:49:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
8/1/1987
Author
BLM
Title
Gunnison Basin and the American Flats-Silverton Wilderness - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Alternatives Including the Proposed Action <br /> <br />Expected mineral development In areas of <br />high potentlal would result In roads being <br />developed I nto this area. These woul d not <br />be open to recreational vehicle use. <br /> <br />No IIllderness Alternative (No Actlonl-The <br />entire Handles Peak WSA would be <br />recommended as nonsultabl e for wll derness <br />designation. <br /> <br />Mineral Resource Development - All land <br />within thls study area woul d remain open to <br />appropriation under the mining and mineral <br />leasing laws. Presently, there are <br />approximately 200 mining claims with the <br />majorl1;y concentrated In the western half <br />of the WSA. <br /> <br />Handles Peak Is geologically similar to an <br />adjacent hi ghly productl ve area of the <br />Eureka Mining District. For the purposes <br />of analysis, It was assumed that similar <br />vein deposits also occur In Handles Peak. <br />The Informatlon known about this WSA does <br />indicate a high mineral potential In the <br />western section for the locatlon of base <br />and precfous metals, uranium and two of the <br />crltlcal and strategic minerals. cobalt and <br />nickel (See Appendix 3.8). <br /> <br />For the purpose of analysis it is assumed <br />that one to three significant underground <br />mines will be developed In the lake Fork <br />drainage area. The larger of the <br />significant mining operations would Involve <br />a total of 50 acres and the other two would <br />Involve no more than 25 acres each. New <br />road construction woul d I nvol ve a maximum <br />length of 3 miles (5 acres) per mine. <br />Development Is also anticipated on private <br />1 and west of the Shel f Road I n the eastern <br />edge of the WSA for base and precious <br />minerals. The mine would disturb 5 to 15 <br />surface acres. <br /> <br />Since the area would remain open to mineral <br />entry, It Is anticipated that there would <br />be a contlnuatlon of new claims being <br />staked in the WSA. It has been reported to <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />Handies Peak <br /> <br />8lM that exploration In the Snare Creek <br />area has resulted In a possible ore bOdy <br />being discovered on private land. If <br />developed. It could result In the Federal <br />land adjacent to It being developed also. <br /> <br />Continued exploration actlvlty In the form <br />of small excavatfons. road construction. <br />and drill pad construction would disturb <br />approximately 20 to 40 acres primarily in <br />the western half of the WSA. <br /> <br />Recreation - Under this alternative the <br />area would be managed to maintain the <br />primitive badcountry character to provide <br />opportunities for hunting, fishing, hiking. <br />photography, and mountain climbing. The <br />expected mineral development In American <br />Basin and Campbell Creek could result In <br />roads being developed Into this area. No <br />recreational vehicle use Is currently <br />permitted In the area so no further <br />closures would be necessary. Roads that <br />resul t from mineral development would be <br />evaluated to determine their suitability <br />for vehicle oriented recreation. Efforts <br />would be made to periodically maintain the <br />Grizzly Gulch, Sloan lake, Boulder Gulch, <br />Cuba Gulch and Cataract Gulch trails. The <br />estlmated current use of 4,000 RUDs woul d <br />increase by about 5 percent annually. <br /> <br />Wilderness Manageablll1;y Alternative <br />Under this alternative 8,220 acres would be <br />recommended as suitable for wilderness <br />designation (see Map 1-2). The boundaries <br />are delineated along topographic features <br />or to exclude mineral development southwest <br />of the WSA. This proposal would also <br />Include the upper end of the vehicle way In <br />American Basin. The boundary would <br />parallel the lake Fork of the Gunnison <br />River on the north and to the east, and <br />would parallel the Cottonwood Creek Road on <br />the south. The boundary follows a ridge <br />line south of Boulder Gulch and the ridge <br />enclosing Sloan lake and American Basin. <br />This alternative concentrates designation <br />around Handles Peak and the surrounding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.