Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />Co:) <br />o <br />~ <br />~ <br />c.o <br /><;j1 <br /> <br />LIST OF TABLES <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br />, <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Table Page <br /> <br />1 Values of (Jo and Y M calculated for com varieties studied in CID <br />coordinated experiments, by simple linear regression for use in <br />Stewart Yield Prediction models S-1 and S-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .43 <br /> <br />2 Values of fJv, (Jp, and (JM calculated by multiple linear regres'- <br />sion for dry matter and grain yields of F4444 corn, grown at <br />Davis in 1974 and 1975...,..............................,............ .46 <br /> <br />3 Values of fJv, (Jp, and (JM calculated by multiple linear regres- <br />sion for dry matter and grain yields of P3955 corn, grown at <br />Fort Collins in 1975. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48 <br /> <br />4 Values of (JV' (Jp, and (JM calculated by multiple linear regres- <br />sion for dry matter and grain yields of NKPX20 com, grown at <br />Logan in 1975 . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 <br /> <br />5 Multiple linear regression and prediction comparison program <br />for Stewart yield models 1 and 2. Output for Davis: 1974 and <br /> <br />1975 combined data. ..............................,......,........... SO <br /> <br />6 Sensitivity of predictions of relative yield and ET by the model of <br />Hanks (1974) to water holding capacity (WHC), evaporation <br />pan factor (PF), and irrigation. Data used for this analysis <br />are for treatment III at Logan in 1975. . . , . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . , . . .65 <br /> <br />7 Hal1-Butcher coefficients and correlation coefficients for various <br />locations and years-grain yields only ...................................65 <br /> <br />8 Comparison of 1975 measured and computed relative grain <br />yields for Stewart models S-1 and S-2; Hanks models H-l <br />and H-2; and Hall.Butcher model, H.B, for Davis. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .67 <br /> <br />9 Comparison of 1975 measured and computed relative grain <br />yields for Stewart models 5-1 and S-2; Hanks models H-l <br />and H-2; and the Hall-Butcher model, H-B, for Fort Collins. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .68 <br /> <br />10 Comparison of 1975 measured and computed relative grain <br />yields for Stewart models 5-1 and 5-2; Hanks models H-l <br />and H-2; and the Hall-Butcher model, H-B, for Logan. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69 <br /> <br />xv <br />