Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Uinta Basin, Utah <br /> <br />The Uinta Basin salinity control project,init1ated in 1980, is the second and <br />l\) only other Title II USDA onfarm program underway at this time. The project is <br />o being iIIIplelllented consistent with "USDA Salinity R.eport, Uinta Basin Unit, <br />W Utah" published January 1979 and supplemented by a November 1980 AddelldUIII. <br />,.j;;;o The iIlIplementation plan includes the installation of sprinkler systems on <br />79,000 acres and improved surface irrigation ~ystems on 43,000 acres. Other <br />associated water management practices are included in the land tteatment <br />phases of the project for salinity control'. The total estilllated salt load <br />reduction estilllates for the fully iIlIplemented Uinta Basin report is 76,600 <br />tons per year. <br /> <br />Present technical staffing has increased to lZ in 1982. Of these, there are <br />two biologists, seven soil conservationists, three engineers, and three soil <br />conservation technicians. Major technical assistance emphasis has been given <br />to developillg complete IWM plans as a basis for long~term agreements, to <br />design and install water management practices, and to onfarm IWM fOllow-up. <br /> <br />The iIlIplementation strategy for the Uinta Basin was to target salinity control <br />planning and application to priority areas within the project. The initial <br />USDA salinity control study looked at nine different evaluation units and <br />treated each area as a separate subunit to the entire Uinta Basin. As <br />iIlIplementation started in 1980, the Dry Gulch area was identified for priority <br />assistance. Since then iIlIplementation focus has been expanded to the Pelican <br />Lake area. This feature has provided for much higher visability and localized <br />iIlIpacts at the project level. ' <br /> <br />A second feature to the Uinta Basin implementation strategy included the use' <br />of complete IWM and salinity control plans as a basis for USDA cost-sharing <br />through LTA's. The LTA approach prOVides for a more substantial commitment on <br />behalf of the farmers and USDA, as well as providing assurance that long-term <br />cost-share provisions will be locked-in for the life of the agreement. This <br />allows for more comprehensive and effective onfarm planning and application. <br />There are also annual cost-share provisions for those landowners who do not <br />wish to participate in the LTA program. Pooling agreements with groups of <br />landowners are also key features to project iIlIplementation through the ACP <br />program. <br /> <br />Under the LTA phase of the program, 139 applications covering 11,954 acres <br />were received in 1982. This makes a total of 313 applications on 32,892 acres <br />since this project started. Plans have been developed and contracts <br />formalized for 48 pooling agreements (4,108 acres), and three individual (258 <br />acres) in 1982. Since 1980, this makes a total of 162 LTA contracts on 17,501 <br />acres. This represents approximately 50 percent of the total applications <br />received to date. Anrlual practice requests for 1982 totaled 25 which included <br />15 pooling agreements and 10 individuals. A total of 93 annual practice <br />requests have been received since 1980. In 1982, SCS fully serviced 44 annual <br />ACP referrals with 29 participants completing their practices. Fourteen <br />applicants cancelled their requests for cost-share assistance. <br /> <br />Table IV-3 presents a summary of the practices applied in the Uinta Basin. <br />The cumulative effects of these practices has served to raise irrigation <br />efficiencies on about 1,470 acres from an average of 30 percent "before" to <br />approxilllately 55 percent "after" practices were applied and maximUIII IWM has <br />been achieved. This results in an estilllated 5,354 acre feet per year <br />reduction in deep percolation and an annual salt load reduction of 12,850 tons <br />for the project. At Imperial Dam, this salt load reduction translates into a <br />1.34 mg/l reduction in Colorado River salinity concentration. <br />16 <br />