Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0\ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />Table 1. Historic Water Utilization Summary <br />for the 23 I~jor Ditch Systems <br /> <br />Historic River Headgate Supply <br />Historic Farm Headgate Surface Supply <br />Historic Farm Pump Supply <br />Total Historic Farm Headgate Supply <br /> <br />Historic Farm Headgate Supply - 6w land <br />Historic Farm Headgate Supply - Class 1, 2, & 3 <br />Farm Headgate Requirement - Class 1, 2, & 3 land <br />Farm Headgate Shortage - Class 1, 2, & 3 land <br />Farm Headgate Shortage on irrigable non-irrigated land <br /> <br />Total Farm Shortage on all Class 1, 2, & 3 <br />Total River Headgate Shortage on all Class 1, 2, & 3 <br /> <br />Acre-Feet <br /> <br />346,300 <br />164,200 <br />86,900 <br />251,100 <br /> <br />31,700 <br />219,400 <br />290,900 <br />71,500 <br />41,700 <br /> <br />113,200 <br />182,800 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> (,) <br /> C,) <br /> OJ <br />Producti ve ('-) <br />Acres Acre-feet per Acre <br />156,501 2.22 <br />156,501 1.05 <br />156,501 .55 <br />156,501 l.bO <br />21,908 1.45 <br />13l+,593 1.63 ,y <br />134,593 2.16 ~ <br />134,593 0.53 <br />19,591 2.13 <br />15l+,184 0.13 <br />154,184 1.18 <br /> <br />~ Under each ditch, the class 6w land received the same supply as did the historically irrigated class 1, <br />2, & 3 land. However, because each ditch had a different supply and because a greater proportion of <br />6w land is found under ditches with greater shortages, the average supply for all 6w land is less <br />than the average supply for the historically irrigated class 1, 2, and 3 land. <br /> <br />EI The historically irrigated class 1, 2, & 3 land has a greater requirement, on average, than does the <br />irrigable non-irrigated land because a greater proportion of the historically irrigated land is in <br />Subbasin B which has a higher requirement than Subbasin C. <br />