My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00456
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00456
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:08 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:46:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.200
Description
Paradox Valley Unit - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
3/20/1979
Title
Final Environmental Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />(yeGG ,1 <br /> <br />( ) Draft <br /> <br />(X) Final <br /> <br />Environmental Statement <br /> <br />Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Type of Action: (X) Administrative <br /> <br />( ) Legislative <br /> <br />2. Description of the proposal: The Paradox Valley Unit of the Colorado River Basin <br />Salinity Control Project would be located in Montrose and San Miguel Counties in <br />southwestern Colorado. The unit would involve pumping brine ground water from a <br />series of wells along the Dolores River in Paradox Valley, thus reducing the <br />influx of salt to the river by an estimated IBO,OOO tons annually below the pres- <br />ent level of 205,000 tons. The brine would be piped to a nearby hydrogen sulfide <br />stripping plant for the removal of toxic hydrogen sulfide gas, then piped to <br />Radium Evaporation Pond in Dry Creek Basin, located about 20 miles southwest of <br />the well field. Land would be acquired and developed as a wildlife area around <br />the pond to compensate for losses caused by the inundation of habitat. A 6-year <br />construction period would be required, <br /> <br />3. Summary of environmental impacts and unavoidable adverse effects: By reducing the <br />salinity of Colorado River water, the unit would have beneficial economic impacts <br />of about $4,186,000 annually for water userS in the Lower Colorado River Basin, <br />In the local unit area, construction would place temporary strains on community <br />facilities and services, but no- long-term impacts would result. Two ranchers who <br />own grazing land and have grazing permits on public land at the evaporation pond <br />would be adversely affected, one quite severely, by the necessary acquisition and <br />withdrawals if suitable replacement lands were not available, <br /> <br />The unit would reduce the average annual flows of the lower Dolores and Colorado <br />Rivers by about 3,950 acre'feet. The salinity of the Colorado River at Imperial <br />Dam would be decreased by a net value of 18.2 mgll, resulting from a decrease of <br />18.6 mg/l because of salt remova~ and an increase 'of 0.4 rng/l because of stream <br />depletion. <br /> <br />The existing warm water fishery in the Dolores River would be enhanced signifi- <br />cantly for the first 7 miles below the well field and enhanced slightly for an <br />additional 63 miles to the confluence with the Colorado River. A slight enhance- <br />ment would also occur in the Colorado River downstream from the confluence. <br />Wildlife habitat would be permanently reduced by 3,630 acres from inundation at <br />the pond and by 28 acres from the construction of other unit structures. These <br />losses would be largely compensated for by the acquisition and development of <br />3,660 acres for a wildlife area and the revegetation of about 218 acres tempo- <br />rarily disturbed during construction. In addition it is estimated that about 60 <br />acres of riparian habitat along about 7 miles of the Dolores River downstream from <br />the well field would be ,slowly improved because of the reduction of salts in the <br />river water. <br /> <br />Two archaeological sites would be inundated by the evaporation pond. Prior to <br />inundation, a program to collect information would be conducted. <br /> <br />4. Alternatives considered: <br />1. One alternative evaporation pond site. <br />2. A lined bypass channel for the Dolores River, with an evaporation pond <br />adjacent to the channel. <br />3. Nondevelopment. <br />4. Five plans for smaller scales of development. <br /> <br />5. List of entities from whom comments have been requested or received: <br />See list on next page. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Date made available to E.P.A. and the~ublic: <br />Draft statement: May 11, 1978----- ~ <br />Final statement: <br /> <br />~/i.R ~ ') 1'379 <br /> <br />'-, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.