My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00451
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:07 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:46:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - BOR
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/1969
Title
Cost Analysis of Six Water Desalting Processes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~ <br />co <br />CJ1 <br />..... <br /> <br />The fixed costs are determined by a number of factors such as the <br /> <br />interest rate, plant life, plant Size, tUbing cost, plant availability, <br /> <br />and tubing heat transfer coefficient, When the preceding factors have <br /> <br />been fixed by study ground rules or by local prevailing conditions, cost <br /> <br />studies can be made for a range of performance ratios to determine the <br /> <br />optimum PR for minimum water costs, On the basis of the ground rules <br /> <br />selected for this study, the optimum PR for various steam costs were de- <br />termined and the results are shown in Fig. 4, This figure also shows the <br /> <br />generalized effect on optimum performance of other factors that determine <br /> <br />the fixed costs. It is clear that optimization studies are needed for <br /> <br />each plant under consideration to adjust for varying local economic <br /> <br />condi tions, <br /> <br />Figure 5 shows the economic number of stages and the required <br /> <br />evaporator area that result for various steam costs and condenser sur- <br /> <br />face costs. As steam costs are reduced, it is economically advisable to <br /> <br />reduce the number of stages and required condenser surface area at some <br /> <br />expense in thermal efficiency, The reverse is true as-condenser cost <br /> <br />per unit of surface area is reduced, and there is some advantage in in- <br /> <br />creasing the number of stages and the total required condenser surface <br /> <br />area. <br /> <br />The performance ratios shown in Figs, 2 and 4 were used to estimate <br /> <br />water conversion costs, which are shown in Fig, 6. Comparison of the <br /> <br />differential water costs in Fig, 6 with the sum of the differential costs <br />shown in Figs. 2 and 3 indicates that savings resulting from the optimum <br /> <br />designs based on both condenser surface and steam costs are from I to <br />3~/kgal greater than when each variable is considered separately. <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.