Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,~ ',5 Story #2 <br />Olllil~;) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />Curry to take local issues to the state <br /> <br />"It's a whole dUJerefll political scene ill Deliver flOW" <br />bv Kristina Johnson <br />The Gunnison Basin's power to fight transmountain water diversion has ratcheted up as Kathleen Curry- <br />a Doyleville resident who was recently elected to the Colorado House of Representatives-prepares to <br />head up the powerful House commitlee on Agriculture, Livestock and Naturai Resources, <br />Just a few weeks after being elected to the state House, Curry was informed that she'd been appointed to <br />chair the agriculture committee, which handles many of the state's water bills, <br />On Monday, November 22, after learning of her appointment, Curry attended a meeting of the Upper <br />Gunnison River Water Conservancy District (UGRWCD) to discuss upcoming water legislation, Prior to <br />running for state house, Curry served as the manager of the UGRWCD, a publicly funded entity that <br />administers local water rights and has worked to protect Gunnison Basin water from Front Range <br />diversion attempts, <br />Curry returned to face the UGRWCD board on November 22 in a new roie-one that carries the potential <br />to shape water policy for the slate as it reaches a critical crossroads. <br />At that meeting, Curry asked board members for their direction and support in spearheading efforts to <br />protect local water interests. <br />As a freshman member of the House, Curry said she is expected to submit her first three bills by <br />December 15, though she wiil not be officiaily sworn in unlil January 12, <br />One piece of legislation Curry will likely deal with in her first term wiil be a funding request to extend the <br />Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI), a study that has ruffied the feathers of UGRWCD board <br />members, who complain that they've been excluded from the SWSI process and say the resulting report <br />could encourage attempts at transmountain water diversion. <br />The SWSI study was commissioned by the Colorado legisiature in 2002 at a cost of nearly $3 miilion to <br />explore, in each of Colorado's basins, existing water supplies along with existing and projected demands <br />for water through the year 2030-and potential options for meeting those demands, The legislature will <br />likely be the institution that makes decisions to fund, or not to fund, particular projects, <br />On November 16, after an 18-month process, the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB)-the state <br />agency charged with overseeing SWSI, approved the report and sent It on to the state legislature, At that <br />time UGRWCD representatives voiced their concern that they had been left out of the SWSI process, <br />something Curry also acknowledged at the November 22 UGRWCD meeting, <br />"The SWSI dialogue wasn't at the level it should have been," explains Karen Shirley, current manager of <br />the UGRWCD, "It wasn't as open as it should have been for a state tax-funded project: <br />One particular concern, according to Shirley, is that the current SWSI report couid set the stage for a <br />single solution to Colorado's water supply problems-and that solution could spelltransmountain <br />diversion. <br />" The state is putting a lot of pressure on west slope communilies to come to the table and talk about <br />transmountain diversion projects," Shirley explains. <br />At the UGRWCD board meeling on November 22, Curry emphasized the need to discuss alternatives to <br />transmountain diversion, which include water conservation efforts and better use of existing water in the <br />basins experienCing shortages. <br />"We need to make sure there's equal attention paid to solutions besides out-of-basin diversions," Curry <br />told board members on November 22, "I want money and time spent on other ways to deal with water- <br />suppiy shortages," <br />Now the CWCS is expected to ask the state legislature for an additional $2S0,OOO to continue work on Ihe <br />Statewide Water Supply Initiative, Curry told the UGRWCD board that she plans to keep a watchful eye on <br />how CWCS spends that money, <br />.. On SWSI, the legislature was not very engaged in the expenditure of $2,8 million," she told board <br />members, As the chair of the agriculture committee, she explained, she will likeiy be expected to sponsor <br />the construction bill embedded with the CWCS funding request <br />" Since I'm supposed to be the one who carries that bill, I think I can ask some questions," she said, ''I'm <br />going to want to communicate directly with the CWCB staff about it," she added after the meeting, "I want <br />to have an idea of what the money will be used for this time," <br />Curry also asked the UGRWCD board members for direction on legislation that would compensate the <br />Gunnison Basin in the event of a trans mountain diversion project. <br />This type of legislation, known as Basin of Origin Protection, would require an entity diverting water to pay <br />fees or build water storage projects in the basin where the water originates. Different versions of Basin of <br />Origin Protection have come before the Colorado legislature in the past, but all have died, <br />Basin of Origin bills have sparked debate among members of the UGRWCD board, Some argue that such <br />legislation is needed to prepare for a worst-case scenario. Others fear that agreeing to Basin of Origin <br /> <br />http://\Vww.crestedbuttenews,com/new s2, h tm I <br /> <br />11/29/2004 <br />