Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. }' <br /> <br />. >) <br /> <br /><.'. <br /> <br />: .' <br /> <br /><::) <br />C) <br />t- <br />oo <br />Hl:a <br />~ <br /> <br />The Big T;hompson River inflow, that was in excess of the minimum required <br />outflow ~elow Lake Estes, was diverted as skim water through Olympus Tunnel <br />on April :25 and continued as available through September. <br /> <br />Snowpack ;in the Big Thompson River Basin was measured at 9.9 inches or <br />93 percernt of average on May 1. Most probable forecasted natural inflow <br />vo 1 ume to Lake Estes for the April-July peri od decreased to <br />70,000 acre-feet, which was 85 percent of average. The May forecast proved <br />, to be quite accurate as actual inflow for April-July was 69,400 acre-feet. <br /> <br />The maxim~m daily inflow of 968 ft3js occurred on June 12, and this was <br />114 perce~t of the 30-year average. June was extremely hot and dryas <br />precipitation was only 17 percent of average with 0.33 inches recorded; <br />the 8th lowest monthly total on record in 81 years. Natural inflows <br />decreased:to 158 ft3js by July 31: June and July inflows were 110 percent <br />and 84 petcent of average, respectively. <br /> <br />Due to thd low Adams Tunnel diversions and low irrigation deliveries, most <br />of the Big Thompson River inflow to Lake Estes was diverted (skimmed) for <br />power :f.ro~uction. Releases to the river below Olympus Dam peaked at <br />370 ft js pn June 13. Water diverted into Olympus Tunnel under operation <br />"skim" toltaled 42,809 acre-feet for the year and this resulted in <br />76 gigawat!t-hours of generation. This was 105 percent of the average <br />40,700 acr,e-feet annually diverted. <br /> <br />July and August precipitation at Lake Estes was much above normal at <br />189 percent of average and 141 percent of average, respectively. Total <br />precipitat~on for the water year (October-September) was 19.59 inches or <br />113 percent of average. The inflow above Lake Estes was 89,800 acre-feet <br />for water rear 1990 and this was 130 percent of average. <br /> <br />; <br />Estes Powe~plant generation totaled 95,600,000 kilowatt-hours for the water <br />ye~r and w4s 11,200,000 kilowatt-hours below average. This was due to the <br />below aver4ge Adams Tunnel diversions which were 92 percent of average. . <br /> <br />Carter Lake <br /> <br />Completed ip 1952 with three dams, Carter Lake has a total storage capacity <br />of 112,200 :acre-feet. Inflow of project water to Carter Lake is from the <br />Flatiron Pu~ping Plant with a capacity of about 400 ft3js. <br /> <br />Carter Lak$ storage content at the beginning of the water year was <br />36,450 acre~feet which was below the 30-year average of 51,000 acre-feet. <br />Project wat~r deliveries to the St. Vrain Canal continued through the end <br />of October and totaled 10,421 acre-feet for the month.. . <br /> <br />Continuous pumping to Carter Lake from Flatiron Reservoir continued until <br />mid-Octoberlto accommodate scheduled Charles Hansen Feeder Canal (550 ft3js <br />section) mafntenance during the October 1 to October 12 period. Pumping <br />to Carter Wake was shut down on October 19 due to the high del iveries <br />(400 ft3jS) ito the Big Thompson River and to have a deSirable inflow to <br />Horsetooth ~eservoir. Pumping began again on November 3 and continued <br />through Mardh 17 when Pole Hill Powerplant was shut down for maintenance. <br /> <br />15 <br />