Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 <br /> <br />Overview of Suspended-Sediment Transport Monitoring - Existing management actions <br />taken through WY 2003, under the Record-of-Decision (ROD) have failed to meet even the <br />expectations contained in the Glen Canyon Dam EIS that, compared to the no action alternative, <br />the preferred alternative would result in sand resources in the CRE increasing over time, The <br />basic finding of the mass-balance project team is that downstream transport of new sand inputs <br />occurs much more rapidly than was previously predicted by the Glen Canyon Dam EIS writing <br />team (Rubin et aI., 2002). The rapid export of new sand inputs measured during 1999 through <br />2003, from sediment-starved upstream reaches such as Marble Canyon, indicates that the <br />ecosystem's sand supply does not become progressively enriched over multi-year periods, except <br />during periods when monthly release volumes are at about 700,000 acre feet or lower, Ifmost <br />ROD dam operations prevent new sand inputs from accumulating within the river channel, then <br />re-deposition of new sand inputs cannot occur during occasional controlled floods, termed <br />"BeachlHabitat-Building Flows," Such periodic releases are intended to restore and maintain <br />sand bars that have experienced erosion since dam closure, Suggested alternatives for better <br />conserving new sand inputs include timing the release of bar-building floods to more closely <br />follow significant periods of sand input from tributaries, Another alternative is to schedule <br />BHBF releases during periods when ROD operations at Glen Canyon Dam reflect below-average <br />basin-hydrology conditions, <br /> <br />Nutrient Mass Balance - Under Construction <br /> <br />Evolving Geomorphic Framework <br /> <br />Coarse-Grained Inputs and Impacts: Webb and others, of the USGS, have estimated <br />lesser tributary contributions for both fine and coarse sediments between Glen Canyon Dam and <br />Upper Lake Mead, They find that fine sediment inputs from the Glen and Marble Canyon <br />reaches of the ecosystem are, on average, likely to be a factor of two greater than the estimate <br />used by the EIS writing team in preparing the fine-sediment mass balance reported in the GCD- <br />EIS, Although the fine sediment inputs into this critical upstream reach may be significantly <br />higher than previously assumed, the grain-size data published in the report indicate that those <br />sediment inputs are as fine or finer than inputs from the Paria River, This finding suggests that <br />while sand inputs from ungaged sources are significant and worth monitoring for management <br /> <br />GCMRC FY2005-2006 Draft Annual Work Plan (November 10,2003) <br />