My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00417
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:55 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:44:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/23/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #24
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />209 <br />of "d" the last clause "nor below a flow of 4,000,000 acre feet for anyone <br /> <br />of such years,lI <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: <br />MR. HOOVER: <br /> <br />I guess I was the only objector, so I will iiithdrm'" <br />That comes out. In clause "c", in view of the definitions <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />liThe states of the upper division shall not withhold, and the states of the <br /> <br /> <br />lower division shall not requiro, the delivery of water yrhich cannot be <br /> <br /> <br />reasonably- applied, II <br /> <br /> <br />1m. CARPEHTER: Couldn I t the word "be", reasonably be applied? <br /> <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: "Be" should go next to apply. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: "Reasonably be applied," I thought Ire would clean up <br /> <br /> <br />matters which we had under discussion. <br /> <br /> <br />MH. NOHVIEL: Will you read "c"? <br /> <br /> <br />11ll. HOOVER: The states of the upper division shall not withhold, and <br /> <br /> <br />the states of the lower division shall not require, the delivery of water <br /> <br /> <br />which cannot reasonably be applied to the dominant uses specified in <br /> <br /> <br />paragraph "b" of Article IV." <br /> <br /> <br />11ll. SCRUGHAM: Wouldn't it bo better to put first agricultural, then <br /> <br /> <br />domestic? <br /> <br /> <br />HR. NORVIEL: Domestic, agricultural is the way it reads, <br /> <br /> <br />IdR. HOOVER: It doesn I t matter to me, you can have it that way, <br /> <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: I think that is better. Is it use or uses? <br /> <br /> <br />Jill. HOOVER: Uses I guess, <br />The next that was worrying us yesterday, in reforence to paragraph IV, <br />the first paragraph, and in view of the defL~ition we can now cut out the <br />viOrds "municipal and industrial uses." <br />11ll. CARPENTER: And make "domestic, agricultural". <br />MR. EMERSON: "Domestic, agricultural and power, <br /> <br />1m. HOOVER: Well, the clause "Provided the congress assents" was not <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.