My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00417
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:55 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:44:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/23/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #24
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />227 <br /> <br />graph, which narrows the discussion dovm to the socond part. <br /> <br />Illhc f ac t i3 TIC <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />havoalreacly agreed to it except for this affirmative declaratiqn about povror. <br /> <br />Is there any commont on that first sontence. <br /> <br />J.iR. CALI)nELL: On tho first part, !Jr. Chairman? <br /> <br />CfLURlih\N HOOVER: Yos. <br /> <br />J.ffi. C,\LDYIELL: If it vron I t overtax the pationce of tho Commission, I <br /> <br />vrould like a littlo timo to think about that before I givo my consont. I am <br /> <br />willing to considor the second scmtonce. <br /> <br />CI1AIR1~N HOOVER: You wouldn't review a paraGraph as. already agreed upon. <br /> <br />ME. CALDWELL: If we have agreed on that and that is binqinf, on us, there <br /> <br />is no; use discuSSll1g it. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHi\IRL!i\N HOOVEl1: I was just wondering _ <br /> <br />1m, CALDWELL: (Interrupting) I only have this thought in mind, that <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />possibly I might want to offer a suggestion for its improvement, that is <br /> <br />all, and in harmony with the general idea of it. <br /> <br />CfL\llll;~N HOOVER: All right then, on the second sentenc~. <br /> <br />JUDGE Dj\vIS: I assumo that is satisfactory to overybody else, then. <br /> <br />I3Hi\llll,!AN HOOVER: Is it satisfactory to everybody else? <br /> <br />(,\11 the remaining members of the commission answored in the affirmative.) <br /> <br />CHAJR[,L\N HOOVER: The second sentence: <br /> <br />IIAnd such impounding and use in onc basin shall not, create any right <br />effectivo beyond that basin nor affect the flow of waters in the other basin." <br /> <br />J,m. NORVIEL: I think wc shall havo to objoct to that. This just came <br /> <br />to our notice it moment ago. We had no prior information as some of the <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />others had, but it seems to me that thore is somothing in th"re that would <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />make it very objectionable to the Lower Division. <br /> <br />1m. SCRUG~UA: I object to the second sontence on the ground that it <br /> <br />would be only provocativo of controversy and for no purpose. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.