Laserfiche WebLink
<br />223 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />2nd Part <br />24th Mooting <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />GJ-I,\.IHI:L\N HOOVilll: 1'Io nOTi como to paragraph (b), ,\.rticlo IV. ;cs tho <br /> <br />paragraph stands, in viow of our dofinition T~ can mako cortain changos. <br /> <br />In tho fourth lillo, He can cut out tho YlOrds Ilm"Lmicipal, <:l[:,-ricultural, mining, <br /> <br />milling, and other industrial purposos.ll <br /> <br />tin. SCRUGlL\.J.I: Boforo that is dono Trould tho torms "mining and milling" <br /> <br />in tho procoding lino <br /> <br />CHAIru,u\H HOOVER: (Intorrupting) Ho don't neod to cut out "agricultural". <br /> <br />cut otlt "min:Lng, milling and othor industrial purposos." "\.nd in tho third <br /> <br />lino at tho ond of the j)aragraph TlO can eut thom all out. That paragraph <br /> <br />thon would read thus: liTho uso of tho water or tho Colorado Hivor Syctom <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />for purposos of gcnoratir.g oloctrical power shall bo subserviont to the usos <br /> <br />and nqcossary conswnpticm of such .wators for domestic and agricultural <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />purposos, and shall not intorfere with or prevent the use of said Tiaters {or <br /> <br />said dominant purpoGos.ll <br /> <br />ITa have another problem that has CODG up horo and has boon discussed <br /> <br />in connection Trith this nording. It docsn I t necessarily folloTl thnt it has <br /> <br />to - that this ho.o to be rOTlritton. In other y;ords, I'm can leave it stand <br /> <br />as TlO ,have alroady agreed to it and tIle other problem that has' arisen in <br /> <br />Yihich the other draftinG rrD.~) attacked, is that no vr11ero in this compact do <br /> <br />1;[0 mal~:o any reference to the use of the liratc.T fqr po-acr plU"p03CS. no e;ot no <br /> <br />specific. control of tho nntor for pm'rer and'i'rhcre YTC have limited this pact, <br /> <br />as vrc :have all through it, lor the necessary- consumptive uses, ete., Yle have <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />probably by draft eliminated tho control of poner from the pact. It -,'[ill <br /> <br />boar that construction, and therefore it is necessary for us to put into the <br /> <br />.: <br /> <br />pact a control of ponor specifically, so that thore can bo no quostion raisod <br /> <br />as to'Y~1at tho interpower rights aro between the two Basins. ITe havo all <br /> <br />gone on tho assumption that pOHer nas limitod by the exproG,siono that ViO <br />