Laserfiche WebLink
<br />217 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />formulated and in front of us? <br /> <br /> <br />MR. MC CLURE: Judge Sloan, what is your slad on that? <br /> <br /> <br />JUDGE SLOAN: I think it v;iso, as a matter of prudence, tq put something <br /> <br /> <br />on the end that would pcrmit of the asse:1t of Congress being made, without <br /> <br /> <br />impairing the compact as a whole. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: I was wondering if a saving clause might be added at the <br /> <br /> <br />end of the whole compact, in the event any part should be objected to, so <br /> <br /> <br />that it would not vitiate the compact, - something that would not be too <br /> <br /> <br />broad. <br /> <br />LIR. HOOVEH: That vmuld open the doer for each state to take its goods <br /> <br />out. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />I.IR. DAVIS: I havo expressed it this v,ay: "If Congress shall withhold <br /> <br /> <br />its consent to this paragraph, the other provisions of this compact shall, <br /> <br /> <br />nevertheless, remain bindinG upon the signatory states," <br /> <br /> <br />],IR. lJORVIEL: You might take the vrord "states'" out, lem;ing it <br /> <br /> <br />" signatory"" <br /> <br /> <br />MH. HOOVER: You might omit the nord "withhold", simply say" If Congress <br /> <br /> <br />does not consent.1I <br /> <br /> <br />MR. El\lERSOlJ: Should that not be "signatories"? ".If Congress shall <br /> <br /> <br />not consent to this paragraph, the other provisions of this compact shall, <br /> <br /> <br />novertheless, remain binqing upon the signatories"'! <br /> <br /> <br />HR. CARPE1TTEl,: Hhy not simply say "signatories"? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />.. <br />