Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This project is currently on track, and will continue through FY 98/99 due to <br />administrative and legal issues involved. It is difficult to predict amounts oftirne and <br />funding that may be required for resolution. The progress will be monitored through <br />status updates at Management and Implementation Committee meetings to track progress <br />and identifY any potential problems. <br /> <br />IX. FY 97 Budget <br /> <br />Decrees in 5-92CW286 and 5-94CW330 <br />Funds provided in FY - 1997: <br />Funds expended in FY - 1997: <br />Difference: <br /> <br />$ 6,189 <br />$ 6189 <br />$ 0 <br /> <br />Colorado River <br />Funds provided in FY - 1997: <br />Funds expended in FY - 1997: <br />Difference: <br />Explanation: <br /> <br />$ 89,405 <br />$ 129600 <br />$ 40,195 <br />Additional work not anticipated in the original Scope of Work includes a <br />significant amount oftirne by CWCB and AGO staffs spent on the 15 Mile <br />Reach Strategy Work Group <br /> <br />Yampa River <br />Funds provided in FY - 1997: <br />Funds expended in FY - 1997: <br />Difference: <br />Explanation: <br /> <br />$ 84,405 <br />$ 58 300 <br />$ 26,105 <br />Less time was spent on instream flow protection in the Yampa River <br />because AGO requested that further activities on the 95CW155 and <br />95CW156 cases be delayed until further negotiation with Recovery <br />Program members, other interested parties and the objectors took place. <br /> <br />Little Snake River <br />Funds provided in FY - 1997: <br />Funds provided in FY - 1997: <br />Difference: <br />Explanation: <br /> <br />$ 2,000 <br />$ ---.Q <br />$ 2,000 <br />No flow recommendations have been developed yet by theFWS. <br /> <br />White River <br />Funds provided in FY - 1997: $ 7,046 <br />Funds provided in FY - 1997: $ 0 <br />Difference: $ 7,046 <br />Explanation: No flow recommendations have been developed yet by the FWS. <br /> <br />3 <br />