My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00415
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:53 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:44:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8103
Description
Arkansas river Basin Legislation
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/31/1968
Author
W W Wheeler and Asso
Title
Coordinator of Natural Resources - State of Colorado - Exhibits on Water Legislation Investigations for the Arkansas River Basin - Volume IV --January 31 1968
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />t <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />t <br />, <br />t <br />I <br />t <br />t <br />t <br />-t <br />t <br /> <br />0:2148 <br /> <br />general trend line beginning In the early 1950's. From this method <br />of analysis, It was determined that the August and September diversions <br />were decreased during these latter years by approximately 30 percent. <br />Studies of other months and other major canals showed a similar pattern. <br />As a check on the validity of this analysis, a double mass curve of <br />the August diversions of the Fort Lyon Canal was plotted against the <br />accumulated August discharges of the Arkansas River near Pueblo, and <br />this Is shown on Exhibit D. The same conclusion was drawn from the <br />double mass curve as was Indicated by the single mass curve. <br />Beginning at the bottom of Page 7 of the report are two <br />short paragraphs which cover multiple regression studies. Five basic <br />studies developing 61 different relationships of natural occurrences <br />In the Arkansas River Basin were developed on a digital computor. <br />Questions which might be asked regarding the analyses we <br />made might Include the following: <br /> <br />1. What is the multiple regression analyses? <br /> <br /> <br />2. Why is it used? <br /> <br /> <br />3. What does It prove? <br /> <br /> <br />4. What ingredients are Involved? <br /> <br /> <br />5. Why should they be used In any analysis of the <br /> <br /> <br />Arkansas River Basin water studies? <br /> <br /> <br />6. What kind of results do you expect? <br /> <br />The results of one of the 61 relationships computed by the <br /> <br /> <br />regression analyses is shown on Exhibit E. This study is of return <br /> <br /> <br />flow or accretions to the stream In the reach between Pueblo and <br /> <br /> <br />La Junta. In the left column under Variable No., there are numbers <br /> <br /> <br />from I to 17, each of which Identifies a natural occurrence which <br /> <br /> <br />may affect the return flow to the stream. Some of the natural <br /> <br /> <br />occurrences included In this particular relationship are precipitation, <br /> <br /> <br />seepage losses from canals, irrigation water applied in excess of the <br /> <br /> <br />consumptive use of irrigation water, nonbeneflclal consumptive use <br /> <br /> <br />of Irrigation water and well pumpage. It Is elementary that all of <br /> <br /> <br />these Items have a bearing to some degree upon the return flow In any <br /> <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.