|
<br /> Table 4,--Recharge and conveyance facility requirements
<br /> for three recharge alternatives in the South Platte study area c.
<br /> c:7.l
<br /> --1
<br /> 30-day U\
<br /> Onfarm Diversion Canal Pond Total pond diversion
<br /> re(uirement Losses requirement recharge recharge area' requirement
<br /> Sy~tem ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (acres ) ( ft3/s)
<br /> Total New System
<br /> Test areas 1/ 23,300 6,100 29,400 5,700 23,700 395 490
<br /> Remainder 28,800 23,600 52,400 11,500 40,900 682 880
<br /> Total 52,100 29,700 81,300 17,200 64,600 1,077 1,370
<br />..,. Combination System
<br />U1
<br /> New sy~tem y 31,200 28,100 59 ,300 12,500 46,800 780 1,000
<br /> Existing
<br /> sys tem ~ 20,900 7,100 28,000 5,300 22,700 378 470
<br /> Tota 1 52,100 35,200 87,300 17 ,800 69,500 1,158 1,470
<br /> Total ExistinQ
<br /> Svs tem 52,100 45,200 97,300 18,500 78,800 1,313 1,640
<br /> 1/ Total for test areas I, II, III, and IV; for their location see exhibit 7.
<br /> y In order to minimize the river diversion requirement and to maximize carryover storage,
<br /> new conveyance facilities were located as far from the river as possible.
<br /> ~ Fort Morgan Canal, Upper Platte and 8eaver Canal, Lower Platte and Beaver Canal, Farmers-Pawnee
<br /> Canal, Springdale Canal, and Sterling NO.1 and 2 Canals.
<br />
|