Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- ,,~ 'l <br />UuJ'. <br /> <br />Dominant Discharge <br /> <br />The average annual flow volume for a river cannot be used to predict <br />the channel width., The "dominant discharge" of a river has been found <br />to be a contro 11 i ng factor in channel wi dth. The" domi nant di s cha rge" <br />is that discharge which shapes the channel when flowing in regime and <br />has been found to be equivalent to the peak discharge having a recurrence <br />interval of approximately 2 years (USBR, 1973). The long-time 1915 to <br />1975 dominant discharge !or this reach of the North Platte River was <br />estimated to be 6,930 ft Is as determined from a flood flow frequency <br />analysis for the Overton gage (USBR, 1977). <br /> <br />Channel Width <br /> <br />Widths of the river channel have been reduced since 1938. Comparison <br />of 1938 and 1971 aerial photographs readily demonstrates this. The <br />size of bridge openings on the Platte River in this reach has had its <br />influence on the width of open channel. Bridges in existence in 1938, <br />as well as bank control measures, i.e" car bodies provided by the <br />local farmers, represented a significant restriction in the width of <br />the open channel existing at that time. <br /> <br />Channel widths in the vicinity of Overton as determined from the 1971 <br />aerial photographs are about 1,000 to 1,200 feet, The Blench regime <br />width an~lysis equation was applied to the dominant discharge of <br />6,930 ft Is. It resulted in an estimated regime width of 932 feet <br />which is considered a good check on the 1971 channel widths (USBR, 1977). <br />For alluvial channels encountering both scouring and silting, techniques <br />of regime analysis have been developed to determine conditions of channel <br />, stabil ity. <br /> <br />29 <br />