Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\ <br /> <br />Tab le 4 <br />Option 1--Use of saved water <br />Candidate Plan 1--Incremental cost-effectiveness <br />Valuation Cost <br />Units (January 1981) <br />Pahcease $617,000 <br />Zimmerman Wash 1,324,000 <br />Pleasant Valley 6,195,000 <br />Grey Mountain 10,276,000 <br />Purdy-Midview 2,818,000 <br />South Fork Dry Gulch 4,049,000 <br />Duchesne Feeder 388,000 <br />Henry Jim 1,301,000 <br />Subtotal 26,968,000 <br />Interest during <br />construction <br />Total <br />Annual equivalent cost <br />Operation, maintenance, <br />and replacement costs <br />Total annual cost <br />Reduction in concentration <br />at Imperial Dam (mg/L) <br />Cost per mg/L at Imperial Dam <br />1/ Cumulative value for <br /> <br />994,000 <br />27,962,000 <br />2,122,300 <br /> <br />121,200 <br />2,243,500 <br /> <br />3.94 <br />569,400.!/ <br />candidate plan. <br /> <br />O'.}C'lG9 <br /> <br />18 <br />