Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. To this end, Dun.a" of Reclamation (R......l"""at;vn) developed the following objectives for <br />identifying and analyzing the action alternatives to maintain the authorized project <br />purposes and comply with the ESA: <br /> <br />..... . o. . #0 o. ro .. Y"O_ .......... . I __ .. .._..~___ n.._____ <br />;;,uppon IDe goals 01 lDe ;;)an Juan l'UV~(" Da:SID n..ecuve...y 1I11111t:UU:UUIlIUU r lUl!;l 4111 <br />(SJRBRIP): (A) Conserve populations of Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker <br />in the San Juan River Basin consistent with the recovery goals established under the ESA <br />by meeting SJRBRlP Flow Recommendations or a reasonable alternative thereto: and (B) <br />to proceed with water development in the Basin in compliance with federal and state <br />laws, interstate compacts, Supreme Court Decrees, and federaltTUst responsibilities to the <br />Southern Ute Indian and Ute Mountain Ute Tribes and the Jicarilla Apache and Navajo <br />Nations. <br /> <br />Delete the paragraph set forth on IIA, lines 137-143, in its entirety since its basic concept <br /> <br />has been combined with the preceding paragraph. <br /> <br />~Ittt SJRBRIP' Flott RII.""vluun..uda[~on5 o. ... I "'...;,vuablt .l)tuntltiYl.. U.li\...(.to. Oplo..1l.,th.. <br />?';a~J.jo Dc.u.u to l-'lVV~J.1". .:>ll....l.LIlI Av't'Y':>;1I tllG SUJI ';UIlJ...II R..;........ dO~Ll.5.hl".l.LIu l~vlll ;t~ <br />GOtlfla.G.l.lGG \\ ;(11 tIn.. ..o\a~IIU:'.~ ~ Y\..I (hut J.ttl".U1l-'t tv 111\..I".( tin", flu", -3lal;.:>l;\"'';) (utk, fll.,.'iU\..IH....~y, <br />"'.dd dUlal;on) lI."IwVlIUUl".uJ""d Ly till". SJRDR.If' [VI tin... .3tJ.;ug lUUV[[ pl".L;vd l.LIIJ. tlK La.lsd <br />ba3' flo.......,!, dot-vl.l.;)b\..au.l. GUlli r IlJ...IUI~.ugtou {SOQ- t,OOO ",,[.;)) Eo. (h, ~tuJ.LU1""1, [all UoI1d 't"r' ~Ul""1 <br />p....1;od5, 01 J. 1GJ.5vu"bl.... o..I.1t\"o11ll.l.l;".... to tLG 1....\,..VIlUIl....ud.ll.I.t~OIl.;:. of lll.... SJRDIUP. a~nsc <br />Illvd.;K....d. Ly OOR) <br /> <br />C. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />The sentence set forth on II-7, lines 217-221, should be deleted because it is incorrect and <br /> <br />does not add anything to the discussion. <br /> <br />[a.&.lJ ~1l 2000, ~l n~ d....t"'u~u'd dud u. 11.1.~1.L~1.I.IUJ.1I l.,k~(.. 1ell.... vf2S0 ",f.;:. UJ.ld""'1 tl1.....;:.'" lnv <br />4Gt~OI1 alt"'1.1.I."L~v"\"';:' nvu.ld. Ilvt b", cOl.tlulGd tv n~ut'l, IlttllGl, ld....~"'.;) a.;) 1un a3 :::50 ",f., <br />nuu.ld. b.... u",,,,,,d.cd to b",th...1. 11.."....11 LuJ(" flo~.3 b....lvVY r a.&. 111;'.115(011 tlllOU&.lOU.( (11(. )GcL. <br />....(1.......3;115 ad... ....1.3.... ~Ilp(l.....b ~l tll.... Sa.&.1. J 1.1."'..11 R.;.......1 aDv....... r UoIl1wlAtOil. <br /> <br />D. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />At the Cooperating Agency meeting, Reclamation agreed to combine the two s~ction. <br /> <br />which describe and evaluate the alternatives. As presently written, the sections are not <br /> <br />consistent; i.e., the description of the 250/5000 alternative, II-II, does not track with the <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />(~~731 <br />