My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00380
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:43 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:42:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects-Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co-Limestone-Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/1/1992
Author
US Dept of Agricultu
Title
Lower Arkansas River Basin - Water Quality Study - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />002535 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I. SUMMARY <br /> <br />The initial objective of this study was to identify <br />potential water quality project areas that could be <br />implemented to produce a positive affect on salinity levels <br />in the Arkansas River. <br /> <br />A canal system model and a river model were developed for <br />purposes of making water quality evaluations. sixteen canal <br />systems were studied for possible project implementation. <br />The nature of the proposed projects would be to implement <br />on-farm practices, such as irrigation water management, land <br />leveling, ditch lining, water control structures, etc. It <br />was estimated that these improvements would raise the on- <br />farm irrigation efficiency by 15 percent (40 to 55 percent). <br /> <br />These potential projects were evaluated as single projects <br />(one canal system) and combinations of projects. The on- <br />farm effects generally include an increase in crop <br />consumptive use and a reduction in return flows and <br />groundwater recharge. It was determined that the effects on <br />water quality in the Arkansas River would be minor. For <br />example, with projects implemented on all canal systems the <br />total dissolved solids (TDS) was estimated to be 2511.3 mg/l <br />at the Colorado-Kansas state line compared to 2509.22 mg/l <br />without the projects. This is typical of data at other <br />locations along the river. <br /> <br />It appears that the most significant positive effects of <br />these projects would be local benefits of increased crop <br />production due to greater water availability and possibly <br />reduced irrigation pumping costs, both a result of improved <br />irrigation efficiencies. Operation and maintenance (O&M) <br />and labor costs would be reduced significantly. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />For example, there appears to be a shortage of water to meet <br />crop consumptive use in the Holbrook Canal of 15,468 AF in <br />the without project conditions. If the on-farm irrigation <br />efficiency could be improved by 15 percent, this shortage <br />would be reduced to 8,338 AF, or a reduction of 46 percent. <br />Water users under the Fort Lyons Canal pump about 27,304 AF <br />of irrigation water in the without project condition. with <br />the pumpage, there still remains a consumptive use shortage <br />of 34,030 AF. with project conditions, there would be no <br />shortage and 17,081 AF less pumpage would be needed. <br /> <br />The two models used in this study are available for more <br />site specific investigations on other studies of this <br />nature. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.